APHC010564172025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH TUESDAY, THE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No. BETWEEN: 1. SRI SUBRAHMANYESWARA CONSTRUCTIONS, REP. BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER, K. MUTYALA RAO, S/o. K. MANIKYAM, AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS, D.No.1 MERAKA, KUMMARA PURUGU PALEM VILLAGE, MOGALTHUR MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, TRANSPORT, ROADS AND BUILDINGS DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT AT VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 2. THE ENGINEERINCHIEF, ROADS AND BUILDINGS DEPARTMENT HOD BU ANDHRA PRADESH 3. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, RAND B CIRCLE, ELURU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 4. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, R AND B DIVISION, BHIMAVARAM WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 5. THE DEPUTY EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, NARSAPUR, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No. 29263/2025 SRI SUBRAHMANYESWARA CONSTRUCTIONS, REP. BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER, K. MUTYALA RAO, S/o. K. MANIKYAM, AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS, D.No.1-85, KANDULAPATIVARI MERAKA, KUMMARA PURUGU PALEM VILLAGE, MOGALTHUR MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, TRANSPORT, ROADS AND BUILDINGS DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT AT VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT THE ENGINEERINCHIEF, ROADS AND BUILDINGS DEPARTMENT HOD BUILDINGS, M.G.ROAD, VIJAYAWADA, ANDHRA PRADESH – 520010. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, RAND B CIRCLE, ELURU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, R AND B DIVISION, BHIMAVARAM WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. THE DEPUTY EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, SUB NARSAPUR, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3330] SEVENTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO SRI SUBRAHMANYESWARA CONSTRUCTIONS, REP. BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER, K. MUTYALA RAO, S/o. K. MANIKYAM, 85, KANDULAPATIVARI MERAKA, KUMMARA PURUGU PALEM VILLAGE, MOGALTHUR MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, TRANSPORT, ROADS AND BUILDINGS DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT AT VELAGAPUDI, THE ENGINEERINCHIEF, ROADS AND BUILDINGS ILDINGS, M.G.ROAD, VIJAYAWADA, THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, RAND B CIRCLE, ELURU, THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, R AND B DIVISION, SUB-DIVISION, 2 6. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, SUB-DIVISION, ROADS AND BUILDINGS, NARSAPUR, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 7. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT, A.P SECRETARIAT AT VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, order or direction mostly one which is in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in non-payment of amounts due to the Petitioner even after finalizing the bills, payable in relation to the works executed in pursuance of works, i.e. (1) Urgent Repairs to Metrevu - Perupalem Beach Road from Km 0.0000 to 3.900 in West Godavari District (WGMD 212) due for an amount of Rs .17,41,491/- (2) Urgent Repairs to Narsapuram - Karimsettivaripalem Road from Km 0.0000 to 10.000 in West Godavari District due for an amount of Rs.20,51,104/- as illegal, arbitrary, unjust, unfair, unreasonable and unconstitutional and consequently direct the Respondents to make the payment of amounts due to the Petitioner in respect of above execution of works forthwith and pass such other order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. CHERUVU CHAITANYA BHARGAVA SARMA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR ROADS BUILDINGS 2. GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING The Court made the following: 3 ORDER: The present writ petition is filed aggrieved by the action of the respondents in not paying the bill amounts despite execution of the work. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that pending consideration of the Writ Petition, the respondent authorities have paid amounts due to the petitioner and nothing survives in the Writ Petition for adjudication. Hence, prayed to close the Writ Petition. 2. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 17.02.2026 Harin 4 125 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO W.P.No. 29263 OF 2025 Date: 17-02-2026 Harin