APHC010556222013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] TUESDAY,THE THIRD DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 10100/2013 Between: 1. K. BUCHI RAJU, D/O. RAMA BABU, OCC: FIELD ASSISTANT, (UNDER TERMINATION), R/O. B./ KOTHURU VILLAGE, CHODYAM POST, KOYYURU MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE GOVERNMENT OF A P REP BY IS PROJECT DIRECTOR, DISTRICT WATER MANAGEMENT AGENCY, VISAKHAPATNAM TOWN & DISTRICT. 2. THE M P D O KOYYURU NODAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one m the nature of writ of mandamus to declaring the to issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 1st respondent in issuing notice No.151/2012/DVC/B4, dt.26.06.2012 as illegal, arbitrary, violative of Principles of Natural Justice, suffers from non- application of mind, contrary to G.O.Ms.No.98 dt.09.03.2010, Circular dt.27.01.2010 and also contrary to the law laid down by this Hon'ble Court in W.P.No.14121 of 2009 and batch dt.07.07.2010 and consequently direct the respondents to continue the petitioner as Field Assistant, NREGS, Marriwada, Koyyuru Mandal, Visakhapatnam District with all consequential and incidental benefits attached to the post 2 IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 12552 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased suspend the proceedings of the 1st respondent issued in notice No.151/2012/DVC/B4, dt.26.06.2012, pending disposal pending disposal of To the above writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P V V SATYANARAYANA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. The Court made the following: 3 Order:- Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive any further. Hence, the matter has become infructuous. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N 03.02.2026 PNS