Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 25410 (AP)

K. Nagabhushana v. State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/26729/2018 · 2026-02-03

Sumathi Jagadam

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010563702018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] WEDNESDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 26729/2018 Between: 1. K. NAGABHUSHANA, S/O K. CHINNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS, OCC.- CULTIVATION, R/O. DOOR NO. 1/152, KURUBAVANDLAPALLI VILLAGE, PENUKONDA MANDAL, ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE. ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE (REGISTRATIONS AND STAMPS) DEPARTMENT, STATE SECRETARIAT AT VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE. 3. THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR, HINDUPUR, ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE. 4. THE SUBREGISTRAR, PENUKONDA, ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE. 5. THE TAHSILDAR, PENUKONDA MANDAL, ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be 2 pleased toto issue an appropriate writ, or order or direction, more particularly, one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 4th respondent in issuing intimation of refusal dated 30-12-2017 for registration of the sale deed dated 13-12-2017, without assigning any reasons for refusal as contemplated under Section 71 of the Registration Act, 1908 and without furnishing the list of prohibited properties, by simply saying that the property covered by the Sy. No.505/IB of Yerramanchi Village, .Penukonda Mandal, Ananthapuramu District is in prohibition list, as highly illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional being violative of Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and also violative of principles of natural justice, principles of promissory estoppel and doctrine of legitimate expectation and consequently set aside the intimation of refusal dated 30-12-2017 issued by the 4th yespondent, in the interest of justice and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent No 2 herein to delete the Sy. No. 505/1B, situated at Erramanchi village, Penukonda Mandal, Ananthapuramu District from the prohibited list of properties and thereby direct the 46 respondent to receive, register and release the sale deed dated 13-12- 2017 in favour of the petitioner in respect of land admeasuring Ac.2-06 Cents in Sy. No. 505/1B, situated at Erramanchi village, Penukonda Mandal, Ananthapuramu District, without reference to the prohibited list of properties, in the interest of justice and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K SRINIVAS Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REGISTRATION AND STAMPS (AP) 3 The Court made the following ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to file application before the appropriate forum. Permission is accorded, as prayed for. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 04.02.2026 KAS 4 245 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 26729/2018 Dated: 04.02.2026 KAS