- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:19041 WP No. 6676 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO. 6676 OF 2022 (GM-DRT) BETWEEN: 1. SRI RAMESH BABU K.N., S/O LATE K.S.NARAYANA SETTY AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS NO.567, 3RD FLOOR, 10TH CROSS JAYANAGAR 7TH BLOCK BENGALURU-560 070 2. KUMARI SAI SINCHANA R., D/O RAMESH BABU K.N., AGED ABOUT YEARS NO.567, 3RD FLOOR, 10TH CROSS JAYANAGAR 7TH BLCOK BENGALURU-560 070 3. SMT. MEGHANA K.R., AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS W/O BHARGAV D/O RAMESH BABU K.N., NO.567, 3RD FLOOR, 10TH CROSS JAYANAGAR 7TH BLCOK BENGALURU-560 070 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. ANNANAGOUDAR H., ADVOCATE- ABSENT) AND: VYSYA CO OPEATIVE BANK LTD., ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE B.H.ROAD Digitally signed by SUVARNA T Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:19041 WP No. 6676 of 2022 TUMKUR-572 102 HAVING BRANCH OFFICE AT B V K IYENGAR ROAD BRANCH, NO.349, KOMALA TOWRS 2ND FLOOR, OTC ROAD BELEPETE CIRCLE REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER SMT.SUMA S., W/O G.V.SRINIVAS …RESPONDENT (BY SRI.SHIVASHANKARA A., ADVOCATE) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER PASSED BY THE 9TH A.C.M.M COURT IN CRL. MISC. NO.202/2022 DATED: 28.02.2022 VIDE ANNEXURE-D AS ILLEGAL AND CONTRARY TO THE LAW. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI ORAL ORDER The writ petition is filed in the year 2022. On 06.04.2022, a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court had granted interim order. Thereafter, when the matter came up on 21.04.2022, there was no representation on behalf of the parties and the matter was directed to be listed after Summer Vacation 2022. When the matter came up on 01.04.2026, as there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners, the matter was directed to be listed under the caption 'dismissal' today. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:19041 WP No. 6676 of 2022 2. Today also, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners. Hence, it appears that the petitioners are not interested to pursue the matter. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE MEG List No.: 1 Sl No.: 52