Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2541 (ALL)

VIKAS YADAV v. STATE OF U.P.

BAIL/15029/2026 · 2026-05-04

Rajiv Lochan Shukla

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 15029 of 2026 Court No. - 72 HON'BLE RAJIV LOCHAN SHUKLA, J. 1. Heard Learned counsel for the applicant, Learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. The instant bail application has been filed with a prayer to release the applicant on bail in Case Crime no.02 of 2026, under Sections 109(1), 118(1), 123(1) BNS, Police Station Pisawa, District Aligarh. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant states that the applicant and the other co-accused Harendra Yadav have been assigned the general role of assaulting the injured Rinku by using sharp edged weapons. He contends that the injuries were simple in nature and even the doctor in his statement has opined that the injuries were simple in nature. The applicant has no criminal antecedents and is in jail since 04.01.2026. 4. Learned AGA has opposed the prayer for bail and has contended that the applicant and the co-accused, after feeding injured with some intoxicating cold drink, took him to a secluded spot and assaulted him with knives. The intent to kill the injured is reflected in their actions. Even though the injuries were found simple in nature, however, they are numerous. 5. I have considered the submissions made by the Learned counsels for the parties. 6. The applicant and the co-accused have been assigned the role of Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ashwani Tripathi, Ramanuj Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Vikas Yadav .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) assaulting the injured using sharp edged weapons and also of using a firearm. No injury of a firearm has been found in the medical examination of the injured and only incised wounds have been found. The said injuries were found to be simple in nature, as per the statement of Dr. Sachin Verma. The applicant has no reported criminal antecedents. A chargesheet has already been filed and the applicant is no longer required for any custodial interrogation or recovery. 7. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of detention, as the applicant is said to be in jail since 04.01.2026, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I find it appropriate to enlarge the applicant on bail. 8. The bail application is allowed. 9. Let the accused-applicant, Vikas Yadav, involved in above mentioned case crime number be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond and two reliable sureties each, in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to the following conditions: (i) The applicant will not tamper with the evidence. (ii) The applicant will not indulge in any criminal activity. (iii) The applicant will not pressurize/intimidate the prosecution witnesses and co-operate in the trial. (iv) The applicant will appear regularly on each and every date fixed by the trial court, unless his personal appearance is exempted by the court concerned. 10. In the event of breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the court concerned will be at liberty to proceed to cancel his bail. 11. It is made clear that the applicant shall be released on the basis of computer generated copy of this order, downloaded from the official website of High Court Allahabad and verified by the concerned counsel with the undertaking that the certified copy will be filed within 15 days. BAIL No. 15029 of 2026 2 12. It is further directed that the trial court shall send the release order to the concerned jail through Bail Order Management System (BOMS) to ensure early release of the applicant. May 5, 2026 A. Pandey BAIL No. 15029 of 2026 3 (Rajiv Lochan Shukla,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANAND PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- ANAND PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad