1 2026:HHC:42162 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No.1195 of 2026 Date of Decision: 30.09.2026 ___________________________________________________ Narpat Ram ....Petitioner Versus Ms. Suneeta Singh …Respondent ___________________________________________________ Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, Judge Whether approved for reporting?1 ________________________________________________ For the petitioner : Mr. Shagun Sharma, Advocate. For the respondent : Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General. ________________________________________________ Sushil Kukreja, Judge (Oral) Learned Additional Advocate General has placed on record copy of office order dated 05.09.2026, wherein it has been stated that the representation of the petitioner has been considered and rejected. 2. Therefore, in this view of the matter, no further orders are required to be passed in the present contempt petition and accordingly, the same is closed and disposed of. Notice discharged 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2026:HHC:42162 3. However, liberty is reserved to the petitioner to assail office order dated 05.09.2026, in accordance with law, if he is still aggrieved. The petition is disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. ( Sushil Kukreja ) September 30, 2026 Judge (V. Himalvi)