Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010563122025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3164/2025 Between:
1. T. KARUNAKAR REDDY, S/O. T.KANNAIAH REDDY, AGED 63 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.7-68, SANNIDHI STREET, NAGALAPURAM, NAGALAPURAM MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER AND
1. BHANU PRAKASH REDDY, S/o. Not known to Petitioner, Revenue Divisional Officer, Srikalahasthi Tirupati District.
...CONTEMNOR Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the Respondent under the Sec. 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, for violation of the Order passed by this Hon'ble Court in W.P.No.9817 of 2025 dt.22.04.2025 and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. V VINOD K REDDY Counsel for the Contemnor:
1. VENKATA SAI KRISHNA PONNURU The Court made the following:
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CONTEMPT CASE NO:3164 OF 2025 ORDER: This contempt case is filed against the respondents for willful disobedience of the orders dated 22.04.2025 passed by this Court in W.P.No.9817 of 2025.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents.
3. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the respondents submits that pending contempt case, the respondents have complied with the orders dated 22.04.2025 passed by this Court in W.P.No.9817 of 2025 by disposing of the appeal vide order 20.01.2026, as directed by this Court and the same is also furnished by the learned counsel for the respondents before this Court. Hence, no further orders are required to be passed in the present contempt case and requested to close the contempt case.
4. On the other hand, learned counsel for the petitioner did not refute the submission made by the learned counsel for the respondents.
5. Considering the submissions made and in view of the order dated 20.01.2026, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the contempt case shall stand closed. ________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 21.01.2026 BSP
36
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
(closed)
Contempt Case No.3164 of 2025
21.01.2026 BSP