Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 25401 (AP)

M/S INFRA PROJECTS v. SHRI KANTILAL DANDE IAS

CC/5938/2023 · 2026-01-30

Ravi Cheemalapati

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010557132023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] SATURDAY,THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 5938/2023 Between: 1. M/S INFRA PROJECTS, REP BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER, MANNAVA MURALI KRISHNA, FIRM NO. 220 OF 2018 WITH OFFICE AT D.NO. 16-12-618, FLAT NO. 1, SRIVARI AKSHYAM, 3RD LANE, JKC COLLEGE ROAD, VIJYAPURI, GUNTUR DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. SHRI KANTILAL DANDE IAS, THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF PANCHYATHI RAJ, A.P SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. SHRI SS RAWATH IAS, THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND PLANNING A.P SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. SHRI B SUNIL KUMAR REDDY IFS, (CEO) THE ANDHRA PRADESH COMPREHENSIVE FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (CFMS), 6TH FLOOR, C BLOCK, ANJANEYA TOWERS, IBRAHIMPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT, REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN. 4. THE CHIEF ENGINEER, PANCHYATHI RAJ, OPP. PWD GROUNDS, VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT. 5. THE SUPERINTENDENT ENGINEER, PR CIRCLE, ZP COMPOUND, NAGARAMPALEM, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 6. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PANCHYATHI RAJ, BAPATLA, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to may be to summon, prosecute and punish the respondent U/S's 10 to 12 of the contempt of Court Act for willful and deliberate violation of the orders of this Hon'ble Court dated 13-07-2023 in WP No. 13355 of 2023 and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to implead the proposed respondents No. 7 to 11 as respondents No.s 7 to 11 in C.C. No. 5938 of 2023 and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. KODE RAMESH BABU Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. NAGARAJU PULLAGURA 2. RAMA RAO KOCHIRI 3. KIRAN KUMAR VADLAMUDI 4. C SUMON 5. 6. KIRTHI TEJA KONDAVEETI The Court made the following Order: This Contempt Case is filed under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, for the willful disobedience of the orders dated 13.07.2023 passed in W.P.No.13355 of 2023. 2. Sri. G.Ramesh, learned counsel representing the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the orders of this Court disobedience of which is complained of in this contempt case has been complied with by the respondent authorities, as such, there remains nothing for adjudication and prayed to close the contempt. 3. As the authorities have complied with the directions of this Court, there is no purpose in keeping the contempt case pending and the contempt case is liable to be closed. 4. Accordingly, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI Date:31.01.2026 Ksj