Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2540 (RAJ)

ISRAEL S/O MILLU v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/6058/2026 · 2026-04-24

Pramil Kumar Mathur

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:17398] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6058/2026 Israel S/o Millu, Aged About 72 Years, R/o Gulpada, Police Station Sikri, District Deeg. (At Present Accused Is Confined In District Jail Deeg). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Arafat Hussain For Respondent(s) For Complainant : : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP Mr. Mohd. Shakir Khan HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 24/04/2026 1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.48/2026 registered at Police Station Sikari, District Deeg for offences under Sections 189(2), 115(2), 126(2), 74, 303(2) and 333 of BNS, 2023. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor as well as learned counsel for the complainant and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is 72 years old and, being a member of the said family, has been falsely implicated on concocted and baseless grounds. Though the petitioner has been named in the FIR but no specific act has been attributed to him. It is further submitted that there exists a cross- case prior in time, which clearly indicates that the petitioner’s side had also suffered injuries. The petitioner has been in judicial [2026:RJ-JP:17398] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-6058/2026] custody since 29.03.2026. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, consequently, the bail application deserves to be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor and counsel for the complainant have vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner. 6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Israel S/o Millu, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Arun/78