HASIBURRAHMAN CHISTI @ BANTI SON OF SHRI SHEIKHJADA MUJIBURRAHMAN CHISTI v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
SOSA/447/2026 · 2026-03-10
Vinod Kumar Bharwani
Criminal Appealbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 254 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 254 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:10220] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Misc. Suspension of Sentence Application No.447/2026 In S.B. Criminal Appeal (Sb) No. 520/2026
1. Hasiburrahman Chisti @ Banti Son Of Shri Sheikhjada Mujiburrahman Chisti, Resident Of House No.225/42, Alrahman House, Lathiya Gali, Suratram Ka Chowk, Lakhan Kotadi, Ajmer (Raj.)
2. Safdar Hussain @ Chunnu Son Of Late Shri Tasdduk Hussain, Resident Of Yadgar Manjil, Near Jharenshwar, Andarkot, Police Station Dargah, District Ajmer (Raj.). ----Appellants Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Appellant(s) : Mr. Rahul Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sudesh Kumar Saini, PP Mr. Javed Khan HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI
Order 10/03/2026 Instant application for suspension of sentence has been preferred on behalf of the applicant-appellants under Section 430 of BNSS alongwith the appeal, to suspend the sentence awarded by the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge, (Woman Atrocities Cases), Ajmer (Raj.) vide its judgment dated 17.02.2026 in Sessions Case No.80/2018, whereby the applicant- appellants were convicted for the alleged offence(s) & sentenced to undergo maximum period of two years simple imprisonment with fine.
[2026:RJ-JP:10220] (2 of 3) [SOSA-447/2026]
Learned counsel appearing for the applicant-appellants submits that the learned Trial Court has already suspended the sentence of the appellants for a period of thirty (30) days. Counsel further submits that the learned Trial Court has not appreciated the facts and circumstances of the case holistically and the hearing of the appeal will take its own time, hence, the sentence awarded to the applicant-appellants may be suspended during the pendency of the appeal. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the
submissions made herein-above. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material made available on record. Taking into consideration the conviction, term of sentence & the submissions made at bar and without commenting upon the merits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to suspend the sentence awarded to the applicant-appellants during the pendency of the appeal. Accordingly, the application for suspension of sentence is allowed and it is, hereby, ordered that the execution of sentence awarded to accused-applicants, namely Hasiburrahman Chisti @ Banti Son Of Shri Sheikhjada Mujiburrahman Chisti & Safdar Hussain @ Chunnu Son Of Late Shri Tasdduk Hussain, by the learned Trial Court shall remain suspended during pendency of the appeal, provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- together with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each, to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that they shall appear before this
[2026:RJ-JP:10220] (3 of 3) [SOSA-447/2026] Court on 10.04.2026 and thereafter, as and when they are called upon to do so.
(VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J SAURABH /26