APHC010553872025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] THURSDAY,THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3124/2025 Between: 1. RAYUDU SUBBARAO, S/O ADINARAYANA MURTHY AGED ABOUT 61 YRS. HINDU CULTIVATION, R/O H.NO.2-27, NELAPARTHIPADU (V)-533262. RAMACHANDRAPURAM MANDAL, DR BRA KONASEEMA DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI MUKESH KUMAR MEENA IASDISCHARGED, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI-522503.AMARAVATHI. GUNTUR DISTRICT. R 1 IS DISCHARGED FROM THE CONTEMPT CASE AS PER COURT ORDER DATED 22.01.26, VIDE IA NO-1/26 IN CC NO-3124 OF 2025. 2. DR MAHESH KUMAR RAVIRALA IAS, DISTRICT COLLECTOR, DR.B.R.AMBEDKAR KONASEEMA DISTRICT, AMALAPURAM- 533201. 3. 3. D SANTHA LAKSHMI, THE DISTRICT PANCHAYAT OFFICER, DR.B.R.AMBEDKAR KONASEEMA DISTRICT. AMALAPURAM- 533201. 4. 4. SRI PALIVELA RAJU, THE GRAMPANCHAYAT NELAPARTHIPADU, NELAPARTHIPADU(V)-533262. RAMACHANDRAPURAM MANDAL, DR BRA KONASEEMA DISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): 2 Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondents 1 to 4 under Sec. 10 to 12 of contempt of courts Act for committing contempt by wilfully and deliberately disobeying the orders of this FlOnble court in WP NO. 15756/2025 Dt.22-07- 2025 and consequently direct the respondents to attend desilting of Anapakayala Cheruvu situated within Nelaparthipadu (v) within Ramachandrapuram Mandal and not to dump/pour the village waste by the 4th respondent and not to fire the same in and around Anapakayala Cheruvu and grant such other just relief or reliefs as this Flon'ble Court may deem fit and proper under the facts and circumstances of the case and in the interests of justic IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to order dispense with the filing of the certified copy of the order in WP NO. 15756/2025 Dt.22-07-2025 for the time being and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to directing the respondents to attend desiiting of "Anapakayala Cheruvu grant interim direction situated within Nelaparthipadu Ramachandrapu.-am Mandal and not to dump/pour waste by the 4th respondent and their (V), the village men and not to fire the same in and around 'Anapakayala Cheruvu hazardous to the village community and spoiling the causing health water source to the cattle etc.,and grant such other just relief or reliefs as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper under case and in the interest IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased May be pleased to discharge the 1st respondent from the array of parties in the above contempt case, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SRINIVASA RAO PAPPU 3 Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. RAMA RAO KOCHIRI 2. Y KOTESWARA RAO The Court made the following: 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CONTEMPT CASE NO:3124/2025 ORDER: This contempt case is filed against the respondents for willful disobedience of the orders dated 22.07.2025 passed by this Court in W.P.No.15756 of 2025. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that even though this Court specifically directed the respondents to consider and dispose of the representation dated 11.04.2025 submitted by the petitioner, after providing opportunity of hearing to all the parties concerned, within a period of two months, for one reasons or the other, the respondents not disposed of the same within the time period as directed by this Court. Therefore, the respondents not complied with the orders of this Court and violated the orders of this Court. Hence, the contempt case. 4. On the other hand, learned counsel for the respondents filed counter affidavit, wherein, it is stated as follows: “It is submitted that the order of the Hon’ble High Court of Andhra Pradesh is not yet received by the respondents. The petitioner only sent the representation letter on 06.08.2025 and which was received on 11.08.2025 and not enclosed the order of the Hon’ble High Court by me. Even today, the respondent is not served or received the order of the Hon’ble High Court of Andhra Pradesh. I 5 am humbly submitting that there is no willful disobedience in not implementing the orders of the Hon’ble High Court of Andhra Pradesh. I have a great respect and always obedient to the Hon’ble High Court and its orders.” 5. Learned counsel for the respondents further submits that a copy of the order of this Court was received on 11.08.2025. After receipt of the order of this Court, the respondents proceeded further and enquired the matter and disposed of the representation dated 11.04.2025 submitted by the petitioner, within a period of one month, thereafter i.e., 16.09.2025 and the same was informed to the petitioner. He further submits that they have tried to handover the same to the petitioner, but the petitioner refused to receive the same. Then, having no other option the same was served to the petitioner by way of registered post with acknowledgment due. In view of the disposing of the representation submitted by the petitioner, as directed by this Court, the orders of this Court are complied with by the respondents in a true spirit. Hence, no further orders are necessary and requested to close the contempt case. 6. Heard both the learned counsel and on perusal of the material placed on record, it appears that the respondents issued endorsement dated 21.10.2025, wherein, it is specifically stated that the representation of the petitioner was considered and informed that the land of the petitioner is situated in Sy.No.106 is not true and correct, the land of the petitioner is situated in Sy.No.104/3 only. It is further stated that the land in Sy.No.106 is earmarked and classified as R & B Road. The alleged dump of wastage material collected from the village is kept in 6 Sy.No.106 which is classified as R & B Road. Accordingly, the proceedings were issued and the same were communicated to the petitioner by way of RPAD. 7. In view of the compliance as stated by the learned counsel for the respondents and on perusal of the material placed on record, this Court is of the considered view that the petitioner has not made out any contempt case against the respondents. Therefore, no further orders are necessary. 8. Accordingly, the contempt case is closed. No costs. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the contempt case shall stand closed. ________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 26.02.2026 BSP 7 22 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA (closed) Contempt Case No.3124 of 2025 26.02.2026 BSP