Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2539 (JHR)

TABREJ ALAM v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./11758/2025 · 2026-04-06

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:JHHC:9641] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. no. 11758 of 2025 Tabrej Alam, aged about 27 years, Son of Ashfak Alam Resident of village Gamhariya, P.O. and police station- Husainabad, District Palamau … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opp. party Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY For the Petitioner : Mr. A.K.Chaturvedy , Adv. For the State : Ms. Sushma Aind , Addl.. PP 04 / 06.04.2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Hussainabad P. S. case no. 175 of 2025 instituted under Section 103(1) / 238 of BNS, 2023. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner committed murder of Tasis Ansari @ Sonu by throttling his neck and caused disappearance of the evidence of the murder by hiding the dead body . It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false and the petitioner is not named in the FIR. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that except suspicion, there is no material in the record to implead the petitioner in this case. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been in jail custody since 11.07.2025 , as mentioned in para 15 of this bail application. It is next submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is ready and willing to co-operate with the trial of the case and undertakes not to annoy or disturb the informant or the other witness of the case in any manner during trial of the case, hence, the petitioner may be admitted to regular bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposed the prayer for regular bail. Considering submissions of learned counsels and the facts as stated above, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Hence, the court below is directed to release the petitioner on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned SDJM, Palamau in connection with Hussainabad P. S. case no. 175 of 2025 with the condition that the petitioner will not annoy or disturb the informant or the other witness of the case in any manner during trial of the case and will co-operate with the trial of the case and will furnish mobile phone number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change the mobile phone number during the trial of the case. (ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.) Dated 06.04.2026 Smita/-