Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 25388 (HP)

SANJAY KUMAR v. THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS

CWP/17112/2026 · 2026-09-29

Jyotsna Rewal Dua

Civil Appealbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 17112/2026 Decided on: 29.09.2026 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sanjay Kumar …..Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and Ors. .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioners: Mr. Bonit Thakur, Advocate. For the respondents: Ms. Menka Raj Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General, for the respondents/State. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Notice. Ms. Menka Raj Chauhan, learned Deputy Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. Petitioner’s grievance is that his representation dated 15.06.2026 (Annexure P-2), seeking applicability of State of H.P. & Ors. Vs. Surajmani & Anr.2 has not been decided till date by the respondents/competent authority. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner would be content in case the respondents/competent authority(s) are directed to consider and decide the aforesaid representation, in accordance with law within a fixed-time 1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. 2 Civil Appeal No. 1595 of 2025 a/w connected matters decided on 06.02.2025 2 schedule. Learned Deputy Advocate General is not averse to this prayer. 4. Having regard to the afore-submissions, but without examining the merits of the matter, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents/competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representation of the petitioner in accordance with law as well as taking into consideration the above judgment, within a period of six weeks from today. The decision so arrived at shall also be communicated to the petitioner. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge 29th September, 2026 rohit