1 CGHC010031632023 2026:CGHC:28517 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 471 of 2023 Priyatama Choudhary W/o Shri Roop Kumar Choudhary, Aged About 55 Years R/o. Village - Ward No. 14, Near New Bus Stand, Akoli Road, Aarang, Police Station And Tehsil - Aarang, District - Raipur Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Panchayat, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, District - Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - Collector Raipur, District - Raipur Chhattisgarh 3 - Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) / Sub - Divisional Magistrate Aarang, District - Raipur Chhattisgarh 4 - Tehsildar Aarang, District - Raipur Chhattisgarh 5 - Gram Panchayat Akolikala (Lingadih), Through Its Secretary, Block, Police Station And Tehsil - Aarang, District - Raipur Chhattisgarh 6 - Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat Akolikala (Lingadih), Block, Police Station And Tehsil - Aarang, District - Raipur Chhattisgarh 7 - Lalit Didhi, Sarpanch, Gram Pachayat Akolikala (Lingadih), Block, Police Station And Tehsil - Aarang, District - Raipur Chhattisgarh ... Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Rijwan Alam, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Surfaraj Khan, Advocate For State : Mr. S.S. Choubey, G.A. YOGESH TIWARI Digitally signed by YOGESH TIWARI Date: 2026.07.09 18:21:47 +0530 2 Hon’ble Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad, Judge Order on Board 09.07.2026 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that during the pendency of the present writ petition, the circumstances which had given rise to filing of the petition have undergone a change and, by efflux of time, the relief sought for in the present writ petition has already become infructuous. He, therefore, submits that nothing further survives for consideration in the present petition and the same may accordingly be disposed of as having rendered infructuous. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the State does not dispute the aforesaid submission and submits that he has no objection if the writ petition is disposed of accordingly. 3. Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and having regard to the changed circumstances, this Court is of the opinion that no further adjudication is required in the present writ petition. Since the relief claimed by the petitioner has become infructuous by efflux of time, the present writ petition is accordingly dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Yogesh