Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 25381 (JHR)

MD. JAVED @ MD JABED v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./8286/2026 · 2026-09-08

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:JHHC:26915] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.8286 of 2026 ------ Md. Javed @ Md. Jabed, aged 31 years, Son of – Md. Juber, Resident of Nai Mohalla, Yunus Chowk, P.O. + P.S.- Doranda, District- Ranchi, Jharkhand. .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Dilip Kumar Sah, Advocate For the State : Mr. Prabir Kumar Chatterjee, Spl.P.P. ------ Order No:-02 Dated:-08-09-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Doranda P.S. Case No. 162 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 317(5)/3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Sections 11(1)(d)(e) of Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act. And also under Sections 12(1)(3)/13 of the Jharkhand Bovine Animals Slaughter Prohibition Act, 2005. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was involved in transportation of bovine animals for their illegal slaughtering and was driving a vehicle of Xylo make from which the bovine animals have been recovered. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that charge sheet has been submitted against the petitioner but no witness has been examined as yet. It is further submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 02.07.2026 as mentioned in para-01 of the instant bail application. It is also submitted that the petitioner had no knowledge that the bovine animals were being carried for any illegal purpose. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case and also undertakes not to annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M. at Ranchi in connection with Doranda P.S. Case No. 162 of 2026 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated:- 08.09.2026 Amar/