Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 25380 (CHH)

DILIP KUMAR TIGGA v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/5190/2026 · 2026-07-08

Shri Bibhu Datta Guru

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 CGHC010259062026 2026:CGHC:28369 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 5190 of 2026 Dilip Kumar Tigga S/o Blasius Tigga Aged About 41 Years Resident Of Kodagaon P.O. Kodagaon District- Kanker (C.G.) ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Department Of School Education Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya Atal Nagar, New Raipur District- Raipur (C.G.) 2 – Director, Directorate Of Chhattisgarh Public Instruction Indravati Bhawan Naya Raipur District- Raipur Chhattisgarh, 3 - Joint Director Education Division Bastar District- Bastar Place Jagdalpur Chhattisgarh, 4 - District Education Officer Kanker District- Kanker Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Mr. Vinod Kumar Sharma, Advocate For Respondent/ State : Ms. Diksha Gouraha, Dy. Govt. Advocate Hon’ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru, Judge Order on Board SOURABH BHILWAR Digitally signed by SOURABH BHILWAR Date: 2026.07.09 18:19:57 +0530 2 09/07/2026 1. By the present writ petition, the petitioner seeks a direction to the respondent authorities to consider and decide the pending representation dated 11.05.2026 (Annexure P-6) submitted by the petitioner. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has submitted a representation dated 11.05.2026 before the respondent authority/ State Level Committee questioning his transfer order dated 18.06.2025, however, the said representation is still pending consideration. He further submits that the inaction on the part of respondent No.1 is arbitrary and unjustified. Therefore, the petitioner prays for a direction to respondent No.1 to consider and decide the pending representation in accordance with law. 3. Learned State counsel, on instructions, submits that if the representation (Annexure P-6) of the petitioner is still pending consideration, the same shall be considered and decided, in accordance with law and the policy of the State Government, within the stipulated period. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record. 5. Considering the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner and taking into account the submission made by learned State counsel, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to 3 the the respondent authorities particularly the respondent No.1 to consider and decide the pending representation dated 11.05.2026 (Annexure P-6) submitted by the petitioner, strictly in accordance with law and the policy of the State Government, preferably within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 6. With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) JUDGE $. Bhilwar