Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2538 (UTT)

RAJPAL v. VIKAS

WPMS/528/2026 · 2026-03-09

Rakesh Thapliyal

Original Suitbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:UHC:1465 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPMS/528/2026 Hon'ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J. 1. Mr. Susheel Kumar, learned counsel holding the brief of Mr. Gaurav Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. By the instant writ petition the petitioner is praying for the following relief:- “Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction to the Learned Civil Judge (Senior Division) Roorkee, District Haridwar to expedite the application for granting ad-in interim injunction under Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 with Section 151 CPC being paper no. 6C2 pending in the Original Suit No. 305 of 2025, Rajpal and another vs. Vikas and others within a stipulated time period of one month”. 3. The relief, as sought, appears to be innocuous. 4. In such view of the matter, the instant writ petition is disposed of finally with the direction to the court concerned, i.e, Civil Judge (Senior Division) Roorkee, District Haridwar to expedite the ad-in interim injunction application moved under Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 read with Section 151 CPC being paper no. 6C2 pending in the Original Suit No. 305 of 2025, Rajpal and another vs. Vikas and others, within a month from the date of production of certified copy of the order. 5. Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of. (Rakesh Thapliyal, J.) 09.03.2026 Parul 2026:UHC:1465