Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2537 (UTT)

BALVINDER SINGH v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/512/2026 · 2026-04-09

Rakesh Thapliyal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPCRL No. 512 of 2026 Hon’ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J. 1. Mr. Sanpreet Singh Ajmani, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. Mr. B.C. Joshi, learned AGA for the State. 3. On the previous date, learned State Counsel was directed to get instructions in the matter. Today, on instructions, he submits that charge sheet has already been filed. 4. On this, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that since the charge sheet has already been filed, therefore, this writ petition has rendered infructuous. 5. In such view of the matter, writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. (Rakesh Thapliyal, J.) 09.04.2026 SKS