CRWP-7651 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 109 BALJINDER KAUR STATE OF CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present: SURYA PARTA directions to respondent 2. the petitione P-3) before the respondent No. stipulated time. 3. 7651-2026 (O&M) 8587 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA CHANDIGARH BALJINDER KAUR & ANR. VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA Mr. Kuldip Singh, Advocate for Mr. Harsimran Singh Sidhu, Advocate for PARTAP SINGH, J (ORAL) The instant petition has been filed by the petitioner directions to the official respondents to protect respondents No.4 to 9. The learned counsel representing the petitioner the petitioners have filed the representation ) before the respondent No.2. The learned counsel prays for directions to respondent No.2 to decide the abovementioned representation within stipulated time. Notice of motion to respondents No.1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-7651-2026 (O&M) DECIDED ON: 01.07.2026 .....PETITIONER VERSUS .....RESPONDENT SURYA PARTAP SINGH Advocate for Mr. Harsimran Singh Sidhu, Advocate for the petitioners. as been filed by the petitioners protect their life and liberty from the sel representing the petitioners submits that representation dated 20.06.2026 (Annexure earned counsel prays for directions to to decide the abovementioned representation within to respondents No.1 to 3. (O&M) 2026 .....PETITIONERS .....RESPONDENTS for from the submits that (Annexure earned counsel prays for directions to to decide the abovementioned representation within the GAURAV THAKUR 2026.07.01 19:10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-7651 upon the State 5. hereby disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.2 to decide the representation of the petitioner within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of copy of instant order. It is further directed that the petitioners shall be provided requisite safety and security to protect their life and liberty, if required. It is however clarified that any observation is not being made by this Court with regard to threat perception to the pe authority of concerned District shall be at liberty to make an independent assessment of the threat perception to the petitioners, and take a decision on the issue of providing adequate security t Gaurav Thakur Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable 7651-2026 (O&M) 8587 2 upon the State is hereby dispensed with. Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, the hereby disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.2 to decide the representation of the petitioners (Annexure P within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of copy of instant order. It is further directed that the petitioners shall be provided requisite safety and security to protect their life and liberty, if required. It is however clarified that any observation is not being made by this Court with regard to threat perception to the petitioners or the validity of their relationship. The police authority of concerned District shall be at liberty to make an independent assessment of the threat perception to the petitioners, and take a decision on the issue of providing adequate security to them. Whether speaking/reasoned :Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No Hence service of notice Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, the present writ petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.2 to decide the (Annexure P-3) by passing a speaking order within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of copy of instant order. It is further directed that the petitioners shall be provided requisite safety and security to protect their life and liberty, if required. It is however clarified that any observation is not being made by this Court with regard to threat titioners or the validity of their relationship. The police authority of concerned District shall be at liberty to make an independent assessment of the threat perception to the petitioners, and take a decision on o them. :Yes/No : Yes/No Hence service of notice present writ petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.2 to decide the ) by passing a speaking order within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of copy of instant order. It is further directed that the petitioners shall be provided requisite safety and security to protect their life and liberty, if required. It is however clarified that any observation is not being made by this Court with regard to threat titioners or the validity of their relationship. The police authority of concerned District shall be at liberty to make an independent assessment of the threat perception to the petitioners, and take a decision on GAURAV THAKUR 2026.07.01 19:10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document