VINOD KUMAR v. PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AND ANR
CWP/18660/2026 · 2026-07-01
Sudeepti Sharma
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 25365 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 25365 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
105 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-18660-2026 (O&M) Date of decision: 01.07.2026 VINOD KUMAR ..Petitioner Versus PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AND ANR ..Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA Present: Mr. Sahil Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Kshitij Sharma, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Ridhi Bansal, Advocate for the respondents No.1 and 2.
SUDEEPTI SHARMA
, J. (Oral)
1.
Learned counsel for the respondent Nos.1 and 2 contends that there is an alternative remedy of filing service appeal under Rule 14 of Haryana Subordinate Courts Establishment (Recruitment and General Conditions of Service) Rules, 1997.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the present petition to avail the alternative remedy.
3. Dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty to avail the alternative remedy.
4. All the pending miscellaneous applications, if any, are also
disposed of. July 01st, 2026
(SUDEEPTI SHARMA) Saahil/Ayub
JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No MOHD AYUB 2026.07.02 11:12 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.