Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 25349 (KAR)

SRI. N. KRISHNA v. SRI. PUTTEGOWDA

WP/12240/2021 · 2026-06-29

Vijaykumar A Patil

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:32123 WP No. 12240 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL WRIT PETITION NO. 12240 OF 2021 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: SRI. N. KRISHNA SON OF LATE NAGEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, RESIDING AT EECHURU VILLAGE, BETTADAPURA HOBLI, PERIYAPATNA TALUK, MYSURU DISTRICT. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. VINAY G, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI. PUTTEGOWDA SON OF LATE NINGEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, 2. SRI. PAPEGOWDA SON OF LATE NINGEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, 3. SRI. ANNEGOWDA SON OF LATE NINGEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, 4. SRI. SWAMYGOWDA SON OF LATE NINGEGOWDA Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:32123 WP No. 12240 of 2021 AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, 5. SRI. RANGASWAMY SON OF LATE NINGEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, 6. SRI.KARIGOWDA SON OF LATE NINGEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, 7. SMT.KAMALAMMA W/O ANNEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, RESPONDENTS NO.1 TO 7 ARE RESIDING AT EECHURU VILLAGE, BETTADAPURA HOBLI, PERIYAPATNA TALUK, MYSURU DISTRICT. …RESPONDENTS (R2 AND R4 ARE SERVED) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER PASSED BY THE CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, AT PERIYAPATNA, IN FDP NO.03/2014 DATED 09.12.2019 AT ANNEXURE-G AND DIRECT THE COURT BELOW TO TAKE THE OBJECTION RAISED BY THE PETITIONER IS NOT CONSIDERATION AND TO ALLOT ITEM NO.5 OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY TO THE PETITIONER THROUGH R4 AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:32123 WP No. 12240 of 2021 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo seeking leave of this Court to withdraw the writ petition. 2. The memo reads as under: "The undersigned counsel for the petitioner most humbly prays that this Hon'ble court may be pleased to accept this memo as both the parties have settled the matter before the Principle Civil Judge and JMFC, Periyapatna in FDP 3/2014 vide Order Dt:05/03/2025, in the interest of justice and equity." 3. In view of the aforesaid memo, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) JUDGE SHS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 9