Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 25347 (JHR)

M/S SPS-MJM-NKAS (JV), THROUGH ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY, PRASHANT SHEKHAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH ITS SECRETARY-CUM-COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT OF STATE TAX

WPC/6554/2026 · 2026-09-07

Rajesh Shankar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:26885-DB IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(T ) No. 6554 of 2026 M/s SPS-MJM-NKAS (JV), a joint venture, having its principle place of business at Chitra, Chitra Deoghar, P.O. & P.S.-Chitra, District- Deoghar, Jharkhand, through its Authorized signatory, namely Prashant Shekhar, S/o Shashank Shekhar Bhokta, aged about 39 years, resident of Chitra, P.O. and P.S.-Chitra, District-Deoghar, Jharkhand. ... ... ... Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand through its Secretary-cum-Commissioner, Department of State Tax having its office at Project Bhawan, Dhurwa, P.O. & P.S.- Dhurwa, District:-Ranchi. 2. Joint Commissioner of State Tax, Deoghar Circle, Deoghar, having its office at Office of the Joint Commissioner of State Taxes, Deoghar Circle, Deoghar, P.O. & P.S.- Deoghar, District:-Deoghar. 3. Assistant Commissioner of State Tax, Deoghar Circle, Deoghar, office at Office of the Assistant Commissioner of State Taxes, Deoghar Circle, Deoghar, P.O. & P.S.-Deoghar, District:-Deoghar. 4. Assistant Commissioner of State Tax, Audit Unit, Dhanbad- Santhal-Paragna Division, Dhanbad, P.O. & P.S.-Dhanbad, District-Dhanbad. … … ... Respondents --------- CORAM: HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR --------- For the Petitioner: Miss. Amrita Sinha, Advocate Mr. Deepak Kr Keshri, Advocate Mrs. Shweta Suman, Advocate Miss Pragunee Kashyap, Advocate For the Respondents: Mr. Vibhor Mayank, A.C. to A.G. --------- 03/Dated: 07.09.2026 1. Miss Amrita Sinha, learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing the matter for some time, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw this petition with liberty to appeal the impugned order. 2. Leave is granted with liberty as prayed for. 3. All contentions of all the parties are left open to be decided by the appellate authority. 4. The petition is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty in the above terms. (M. S. Sonak, C.J.) (Rajesh Shankar, J.) September 07, 2026 N.A.F.R. VK/Nandini Uploaded on 08.09.2026