( 2026:JHHC:26524 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P(S). No. 6534 of 2026 ---- Shikha Kumari, aged about 38 years, daughter of Rajendra Prasad Jaiswal, Resident of Village-Nawadih Basia, P.O-Gangra, P.S Basia, District Gumla, Jharkhand-835229 .......Petitioner(s) Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand. 2. Secretary, Department of School Education & Literacy, Government of Jharkhand, having its office at Project Bhawan, P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa, District Ranchi, Jharkhand. 3. Jharkhand Staff Selection Commission through the Secretary, having its office at Kalinagar Chaibagan, P.O & P.S. - Namkum, District - Ranchi, Jharkhand. 4. Controller of Examination, Jharkhand Staff Selection Commission having its office at Kalinagar Chaibagan, P.O & P.S. - Namkum, District - Ranchi, Jharkhand. .....Respondent(s) --- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN --- For the Petitioners : Mr. Shaswat Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Sanjay Piprawall, Advocate : Mr. Prince Kumar, Advocate : Mr. Jay Prakash, Advocate --- 02/ Dated: 31.08.2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The instant writ application has been preferred by the petitioner(s) praying therein for the following reliefs: i) For issuance of an appropriate writ (s)/ order (s) /direction (s) or a writ in nature of Mandamus for commanding upon and directing the respondents to consider the petitioner for appointment on the post of the Madhyamik Acharya pursuant to the Advertisement being Jharkhand Trained Madhyamik Acharya Combined Competitive Examination, 2025. ii) For issuance of an appropriate writ (s)/ order (s) /direction (s) or a writ in nature of Mandamus for commanding upon and directing the respondents to publish the result of the petitioner of Jharkhand Trained Madhyamik Acharya Combined Competitive Examination, 2025, wherein, the petitioner has appeared in the said examination, but till date the result has not been published. iii) During pendency of the present writ petition, the respondents may be directed to keep one seat vacant for the petitioner. ( 2026:JHHC:26524 ) 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that since the petitioner is fully entitled for the prayer made in the instant writ application; as such, he submits that this case may be disposed of by giving liberty to the petitioner to file fresh representation before the concerned respondent for redressal of her grievance. 4. Learned counsel for the respondents fairly submits that since no counter affidavit has been filed; as such the petitioner(s) may approach the 4th respondent for redressal of her grievance. 5. Having regard to the aforesaid submissions and looking to the prayer made in the instant writ application, the same is hereby disposed of by directing the petitioner to approach the 4th respondent by filing a fresh representation along with all relevant documents. The moment the 4th respondent receives the representation of petitioner then he will verify the record of the case and pass an appropriate order in accordance with law and applicable rules and regulations within a period of 8 weeks from the date of receipt of such representation. 6. It goes without saying that if the decision is taken in favour of the petitioner, necessary consequential order be passed within a further period of 2 weeks. (Deepak Roshan, J.) 31.08.2026 Abha/-