Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 25327 (AP)

LANKA RAMA SIVA REDDY v. SRI SHASHIBHUSHAN KUMAR

CC/4572/2024 · 2026-01-27

Ravi Cheemalapati

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010550532024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 4572/2024 Between: 1. LANKA RAMA SIVA REDDY, LANKA RAMA SIVA REDDY S/O. ESWAR REDDY, AGE 50 YEARS, R/O. 26-2-27, RITHVIK ENCLAVE, BACKSIDE OF DRK APARTMENTS, ANDHRAKESARI NAGAR, NELLORE URBAN, ANDHRA PRADESH ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI SHASHIBHUSHAN KUMAR, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, TO PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPORTMENT, SECRETARIAT VELAGAPUDI,AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR. - 522 503. 2. SRI B SATYANARAYANA REDDY, EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,(PR) PIU DIVISION, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 3. SRI PEEYUSH KUMAR, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR. - 522 503. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondent herein for the willful, deliberate and wanton violation of the orders dt 25.06.2024 of this Honble Court made in WP. No. 11542/2024 and pass RC,J C.C No.4572 of 2024 2 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. DEVASRI ROSHAN KANCHARLA Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. A JAYANTHI RC,J C.C No.4572 of 2024 3 The Court made the following Order: This Contempt Case is filed under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, for the willful disobedience of the orders dated 25.06.2024 passed in W.P.No.11542 of 2024. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the orders of this Court disobedience of which is complained of in this contempt case has been complied with, as such, there remains nothing for adjudication and prayed to close the contempt. 3. Recording the said submission, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI Date:28.01.2026 Ksj