IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15202 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-127 Year-2025 Thana- SARAI RANJAN District- Samastipur ====================================================== 1. Rajesh Sahni @ Rajesh Kumar Sahni S/O Butan Sahni Resident of Harpur Barhet, P.S.- Sarairanjan, Dist.- Samastipur. 2. Viro Sahni S/O late Munni Sahni Resident of Harpur Barhet, P.S.- Sarairanjan, Dist.- Samastipur. 3. Pawan Sahni @ Pawan Kumar Sahni S/O Late Jitlal Sahni Resident of Harpur Barhet, P.S.- Sarairanjan, Dist.- Samastipur. 4. Vinay Sahni @ Vinay Kumar Sahni S/O Late Ramprit Sahni Resident of Harpur Barhet, P.S.- Sarairanjan, Dist.- Samastipur. 5. Ajay Kumar Sahni @ Ajay Sahni S/O Late Ramprit Sahni Resident of Harpur Barhet, P.S.- Sarairanjan, Dist.- Samastipur. 6. Kavita Devi W/O Pawan Sahni Resident of Harpur Barhet, P.S.- Sarairanjan, Dist.- Samastipur. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Surya Narayan Roy, adv For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Singh, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 4 16-07-2026 Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Petitioners apprehend arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109, 308(3), 352, 351(2), (3) and 3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. 3. As per FIR, all the FIR named accused persons including these petitioners came to the field of the informant and started abusing him and demand Rs. 5 lac as rangdari. On Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15202 of 2026(4) dt.16-07-2026 2/2 protest, the accused persons assaulted the informant. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that these petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in this case. Parties are co-villagers and there is land dispute between them due to which maar-peet took place. Doctor has found simple injury. Allegation of assault is general, vague and sweeping. 5. Learned counsel for the State and the informant opposed the prayer for bail. 6. Considering the facts of the case, prayer for bail of these petitioners is allowed. In the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, let these petitioners, named above, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the, Judicial Magistrate 1st class, Samastipur, in Sarairanjan Police Station Case No. 127 of 2025, subject to the conditions laid down under section 482 Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. Shashi (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T