Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 25312 (CHH)

TANKESHWAR KUMAR PATEL v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/3508/2026 · 2026-07-07

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 CGHC010237792026 2026:CGHC:28091 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 3508 of 2026 Tankeshwar Kumar Patel S/o Siya Ram Patel Aged About 50 Years R/o Village Temar, Tehsil Sakti, District Sakti Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Health Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Nava Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - Collector, Sakti District Sakti Chhattisgarh 3 - Chief Medical And Health Officer Sakti, District Sakti Chhattisgarh 4 - Tehsildar Sakti, District Sakti Chhattisgarh ... Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Abhyuday Tripathi, Advocate For State/Respondents : Mr. Rajkumar Gupta, Additional Advocate General Hon’ble Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad, Judge Order on Board 08.07.2026 1. By filing the present petition, the petitioner has prayed for following reliefs :- “10.1 The Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to set-aside/quash the impugned order dated: YOGESH TIWARI Digitally signed by YOGESH TIWARI Date: 2026.07.08 18:20:31 +0530 2 01.12.2025 passed by the Learned Collector Sakti. 10.2 The Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent authorities to construct the District Hospital at Village: Temar, Tehsil: Sakti District Sakti (C.G.). 10.3 The Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to grant any other writ/writs, order/ orders, relief/ reliefs in favour of the petitioners, which the Hon'ble Court deemed fit & just in the facts and circumstances of the case, including awarding of the costs to the petitioner.” 2. After arguing the matter for some time, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to avail the appropriate remedy by filing an appropriate application before the competent authority. 3. Learned State counsel has no objection to the prayer so made. 4. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Yogesh