Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 25309 (AP)

V.MALLIKARJUNA v. THE HIGH COURT OF AP, REPBY ITS REGISTRAR (ADMN) AND 3OTHS

WP/30894/2010 · 2026-02-01

R Raghunandan Rao, T C D Sekhar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010556532010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3529] MONDAY,THE SECOND DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR WRIT PETITION NO: 30894/2010 Between: 1. V.MALLIKARJUNA, S/O LATE V.THIRUPALAIAH WORKING AS RECORD ASSISTANT I ADDL.JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE'S COURT, KADAPA ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE HIGH COURT OF AP REPBY ITS REGISTRAR ADMN AND 3OTHS, REP.BY ITS REGISTRAR (ADMN) HYDERABAD 2. THE DISTRICT JUDGE KADAPA, DISTRICT, KADAPA 3. THE GOVERNMENT OF AP, REP.BYITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT LAW (LA & J-HOME-COURT-D) DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, AP.HYDERABAD. 4. SRI S SAMBASIVAIAH, FILED ASSISTANT,JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE, COURT BADVEL, KADAPA DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toTo issue an order or a direction or a writ more particularly a writ in the nature of Mandamus by declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in promoting the 4th respondent and other juniors to the petitioner as Filed Assistants vide proceedings in Dis.NO.7282/2010 dt. 12-11-2010 as arbitrary, 2 illegal, discriminatory, violative of article 14 and 16 of the constitution of India and contrary to the provisions of theAP. Judicial Ministerial Service Rules, 2003 and consequently hold that the petitioner is entitled to be promoted as Filed Assistant/ Junior Assistant in accordance with his seniority with all consequential benefits and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2010(WPMP 39295 OF 2010 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the proceedings inDis.NO.7282/2010 dt. 12-11-2010 issued by the2nd respondent anddirect the 2nd respondent to consider the case of the petitioner forpromotion to the post of Filed Assisant/ Junior Assistant in preference to his Juniors and in accordance with the promotion of AP,. Judicial Ministerial Service Rules 2003 pending disposal of the main WP and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP 29682 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. D LINGA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. Y RAMA RAO(SC FOR APHC) 2. VENKATESWARLU POSANI 3. P V MAHESH 3 The Court made the following ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice R.Raghunandan Rao) There was no appearance on 19.01.2026, and the matter was posted for dismissal today. There is no appearance for the petitioner today also. 2. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed for default. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J ________________ T.C.D. SEKHAR, J Date: 02.02.2026 KA 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR WRIT PETITION NO: 30894/2010 Date: 02.02.2026 KA