1 CGHC010320422025 2026:CGHC:27841-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR REVP No. 229 of 2025 The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle – 1(1), Bhilai, District Durg, C.G. ... Petitioner versus Vinay Kumar Singh, Plot No.39, Sandhya Kunj, Kailash Nagar, Housing Board, Industrial Area, Bhilai, District Durg, Chhattisgarh – 490026, PAN AVRPS728J, A.Y. 2019-20 ... Respondent Division Bench: - Hon'ble Shri Sanjay K. Agrawal and Hon’ble Shri Radhakishan Agrawal, JJ. Order (In Chamber) (06/07/2026) Sanjay K. Agrawal , J. 1. This review petition is filed for review/recall of judgment dated 26- 11-2024 passed by this Court in TAXC No.172/2024 and it has been taken-up for consideration in Chamber in view of Rule 90(2) of the High Court of Chhattisgarh Rules, 2007. 2. We have gone through the review petition and the annexed documents. 3. The tax case has been allowed to be withdrawn to the Revenue on the basis of the statement made on their behalf and particularly, relying upon the circular dated 17-9-2024 in which monetary limits for filing SISTA SOMAYAJULU Digitally signed by SISTA SOMAYAJULU Date: 2026.07.08 11:54:07 +0530 2 of appeals in income-tax cases is assessed to be ₹ 2 crores and in the present case, liability has been assessed to be less than ₹ 2 crores. 4. In that view of the matter, after going through the record of the review petition and the documents annexed therewith and also the judgment under review, I do not find any error apparent on the face of record warranting review of the judgment dated 26-11-2024 passed by this Court in TAXC No.172/2024. Accordingly, the review petition is dismissed in limine in terms of Rule 90(2) of the Rules of 2007 finding no sufficient cause for review of the judgment under review. No order as to cost(s). Sd/- Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) (Radhakishan Agrawal) Judge Judge Soma