2026:JHHC:26493 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S). No. 6126 of 2026 ---------- Akanksha Kumari, aged about 37 years, wife of Shiva Nand Tiwari, resident of village Harinamar, P.O. Harinamar, P.S Chainpur, Dist. Palamu, Jharkhand- 822110. ………. Petitioner Versus 1. State of Jharkhand through the Chief Secretary, Government of Jharkhand, having office at Project Building, Dhurwa, P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa, Ranchi. 2. Secretary, Department of School Education & Literacy, Government of Jharkhand, having office at Project Building, Dhurwa, P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa, Ranchi. 3. Secretary, Jharkhand Staff Selection Commission, having its office at Kalinagar Chaibagan, P.O. & P.S. Namkum, Ranchi, Jharkhand. 4. Controller of Examination, Jharkhand Staff Selection Commission, having its office at Kalinagar Chaibagan, P.O. & P.S. Namkum, Ranchi, Jharkhand. ………. Respondents. ---------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN ----------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Amritansh Vats, Advocate Mr. Kumar Abhishek, Advocate Mr. Arpan Manjesh Ekka, Advocate Mr. Ashish Choudhary, Advocate Mr. Rahul Ranjan, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. J.F. Toppo, GA-V M/s. Sanjoy Piprawall, Prince Kumar, Jay Prakash, Advocates ---------- 02/ 31.08.2026 By way of present writ application, the petitioner has prayed for a direction upon the respondents to consider the candidature of the petitioner for appointment to the post of Sahayak Acharya, Class-VI to VIII (Science and Math), under non-para category for Jharkhand Primary School Trained Assistant Acharya Combined Competitive Examination, 2023. 2. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that instant application may be disposed of by giving liberty to the petitioner to approach concerned respondents, so that her grievances raised in the writ application can be redressed. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that since counter- affidavit has not been filed, if the petitioner so wishes, she may approach the concerned authorities for redressal of her grievances. 2026:JHHC:26493 2 4. Having regard to the limited submissions of learned counsel for the parties, the instant writ application is hereby disposed of by directing the petitioner to file fresh representation before the respondent No. 4. The moment the respondent No. 4 will receive any such representation; he shall take decision in accordance with law and applicable rules and regulations within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of such representation. 5. It goes without saying that if the decision is taken in favour of the petitioner, necessary consequential order be issued within a further period of four weeks. 6. As a result, the instant writ application stands disposed of. (Deepak Roshan, J.) 31st August, 2026 kunal/- Uploaded 08.09.2026