Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2529 (MAD)

M.Pounammal v. Vinayagam

CMP/9403/2026 · 2026-04-20

G Arul Murugan

Civil Appealbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CMP No. 9403 of 2026 in W.A.SR.No.28805 of 2026 __________ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 20-04-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN CMP No. 9403 of 2026 IN WA SR NO. 28805 of 2026 M.Pounammal W/o Late Muthukrishnan No.201, Kamaraj Salai Pillaithottam, Puducherry-605 013. ..Petitioner Vs 1.Thiru.Vinayagam S/o Muthukrishnan No.201, Kamaraj Salai Pillaithottam, Puducherry-605 013. 2.Presiding Officer-cum-The Appellate Tribunal -I, under the maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act 2007 Puducherry District, Collectorate, Puducherry. 3. The Presiding Officer-cum-Tribunal I Sub Divisional Magistrate (North) Tribunal for the maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act 2007 Puducherry. 4. The Tahsildar, Taluk Office Puducherry. ..Respondents Prayer : To condone the delay of 32 days in filing of the Writ Appeal. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMP No. 9403 of 2026 in W.A.SR.No.28805 of 2026 __________ THE HON’BLE CHIEF JUSTICE AND G.ARUL MURUGAN J. KST For Petitioner : For Respondents : Mr.C.A.Diwakar for Mr.S.Seenuvasan Mr.C.Vigneswaran – for R1 ORDER (Order of the Court was made by The Chief Justice) This application has been filed to condone the delay of 32 days in filing the appeal. 2.Satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit, the application is allowed and the delay is condoned. 3. The Registry is directed to number the appeal, if it is otherwise in order and list the same for admission. (SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, C.J.) (G.ARUL MURUGAN J.) 20-04-2026 KST https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis