IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Ex. Pet. No. 2133/2026 Decided on: 28.09.2026 Akshat Singh …Petitioner Versus Vice Chancellor & Ors. .…Respondents. ……………………………………………………………………………. Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner: Mr. Atharv Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Rajesh K. Parmar Advocate, Advocate. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J Petitioner seeks enforcement of the following directions issued in the Akshat Singh Vs. Vice Chancellor, H.P. National Law University & Ors2: - “I am in agreement with the view taken by the Hon’ble Bombay High Court. The order passed by the Hon’ble Apex Court on 21.07.2026 in WP (Civil) No. 31/2025 (Prakruthi Jain Vs. Bar Council of India) is binding upon this Court. The petitioner falls within the purview of the directions issued by the aforesaid order. Benefit of direction issued in para-8 of the aforesaid order is admissible to him as well. Accordingly, the writ petition is allowed. Consequently, detention order dated 06.12.2025 (Annexure P-4) and the order dated 04.06.2026 (Annexure P-5) are quashed and set aside qua the petitioner. Respondent-University is directed to permit the petitioner to appear in the examinations of 8th semester and to attend the classes of 9th semester.” 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? yes 2 CWP No. 10560/2026 decided on 20.08.2026 2 2. During the course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner apprised that Himachal Pradesh National Law University and others Vs. Akshat Singh and another3, preferred by the respondent-University against the aforesaid judgment, was dismissed on 22.09.2026. Learned counsel for the respondent-University has also placed on record office order dated 23.09.2026, in terms whereof the petitioner has been granted admission to the 5th year on an urgent basis. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that all the directions issued in Akshat Singh2 shall be duly complied with by the respondent-University in letter & spirit, thereby safeguarding the interest of the petitioner. In view of the above, the present execution petition is disposed of accordingly. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge 28th September, 2026(rohit) 3 LPA No. 538 of 2026 Decided on 22.09.2026