( 2026:JHHC:26745 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P(S). No. 6609 of 2026 ---- Md Iqbal Ansari, aged about 44 years, Son of Aziz Ansari, Resident of: Keduwa, P.O: Gando, P.S: Birni, Dist: Giridih, Jharkhand; …..Petitioner(s) Versus 1. State of Jharkhand. 2. Chief Secretary, Government of Jharkhand, having its office at Project Building, P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa, District-Ranchi, Jharkhand. 3. Principal Secretary, Department of Personnel, Administrative Reforms & Rajbhasha, Govt, of Jharkhand, having its office at Project Building, P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa, District-Ranchi, Jharkhand. 4. The Jharkhand Staff Selection Commission (JSSC), through its Chairman, Kalinagar, Chai Bagan, P.O & P.S Namkum, District Ranchi - 834010. 5. The Controller of Examinations, Jharkhand Staff Selection Commission (JSSC), Kalinagar, Chai Bagan, P.O & P.S Namkum, District Ranchi 834010. …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN --- For the Petitioners : Mr. Aditya Raman, Advocate : Mr. Rakesh Kr. Roy, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Sanjay Piprawall, Advocate : Mr. Prince Kumar, Advocate : Mr. Jay Prakash, Advocate --- 02/ Dated: 31.08.2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The instant writ application has been preferred by the petitioner praying therein for the following reliefs: “i. For issuance of an appropriate writ/order/directions/ commanding upon respondents to consider the case of the petitioner as a successful candidate for the Intermediate Trained Teacher, pursuant to JPSTAACCE-2023 (Advt. No.13/2023) (Annexure-1) as the petitioner having the requisite qualification for the appointment on the post of Intermediate Trained Assistant Teacher (Classes I-V). ( 2026:JHHC:26745 ) ii. For issuance of an appropriate writ/order/ direction to the respondents to immediately and forthwith recall/ rescind the Objection on educational qualification of the petitioner and thereafter declare the result of the petitioner and issue the appointment letter in the favour of the petitioner.” 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is fully entitled for the prayer made in the instant writ application. He further submits that in spite of, the representation dated 11.08.2025, the grievance of the petitioner has not been redressed. 4. Learned counsel for the respondents fairly submits that since no counter affidavit has been filed; as such the petitioner may be directed to approach the concerned respondent by filing a fresh representation, who shall look into the matter so that the grievance of the petitioner can be redressed. 5. Having regard to the aforesaid submissions and without going into the merits of the case, the instant writ application is hereby disposed of by directing the respondent No. 5 to look into the grievance of the petitioner by treating this writ application as representation and take a decision in the matter in accordance with law and applicable rules and regulations and also taking into account Annexure-5, by passing a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 8 weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order and communicate the same to the petitioner and if the order is passed in favour of the petitioner, consequential benefits be granted within a further period of 4 weeks. The petitioner may serve a copy of this writ application along with the relevant documents to the concerned respondent for convenience. 6. Pending I.A., if any, also stands closed. (Deepak Roshan, J.) 31.08.2026 Abha/-