Govindammal v. The State Represented by its The Deputy Inspector General of Prison
WP Crl./1157/2026 · 2026-05-13
L Victoria Gowri, N Senthilkumar
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 25282 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 25282 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
WP Crl. No. 1157 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 13.05.2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMAR WP Crl. No. 1157 of 2026 Govindammal W/o.Rajarathinam, No. 14,3rd Street, Sakthi Nagar, Kalli Kuppam, Ambattur, Tiruvallur 600 053. ..Petitioner Vs
1. The State Represented by its The Deputy Inspector General of Prison, Gandhi Irwin Road, Egmore, Chennai 600 008. 2. The Superintendent Central Prison, Puzhal, Chennai - 600 066. ..Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a mandamus to direct the respondents to grant ordinary leave for 30 days without escort to the detenu, Rajarathinam S/o.Raji aged about 42 years bearing Convict No. 7630 confined at Central Prison -I, Puzhal, Chennai. For Petitioner: Ms.S.Sadhana For Respondents: Mr.S.Raja Kumar, Additional Public Prosecutor https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP Crl. No. 1157 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 ORDER (Order of the Court was made by L.Victoria Gowri J.) Seeking a direction to the respondents to grant ordinary leave for 30 days without escort to the convict Rajarathinam, S/o.Raji, aged about 42 years bearing Convict No. 7630 confined at Central Prison -I, Puzhal, Chennai, the present writ petition has been filed. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.S.Raja Kumar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, who accepts notice for the respondents. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is the wife of the convict prisoner and leave has been sought for making arrangements for the education of their children and for the treatment of her mother-in-law. He further submits that the petitioner has also given a representation dated 18.03.2026 to the respondents in this regard but the same has not been considered. 4. It is needless to state that whenever a representation is made to a Statutory Authority, there is a duty cast upon the authority to consider the same on its own merits and pass appropriate orders in one way or other instead of keeping the same pending indefinitely. Therefore, the respondents are directed to consider the petitioner's representation dated https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP Crl. No. 1157 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 18.03.2026 and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law within a period of one week from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 5. With the above direction, this writ petition is disposed of.
There shall be no order as to costs. (L.V.G.,J.) (N.S.,J.) 13.05.2026 Index: Yes/No Neutral Citation: Yes/No mmi To
1. The Deputy Inspector General of Prison Gandhi Irwin Road, Egmore,Chennai 600 008. 2. The Superintendent Central Prison-1, Puzhal, Chennai - 600 066. 3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP Crl. No. 1157 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 L.VICTORIA GOWRI, J. AND N.SENTHILKUMAR, J. mmi WP Crl. No. 1157 of 2026 13.05.2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis