Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 25281 (KAR)

SRI. K. A. SRIDHARA v. THE ADMINISTRATOR

WP/36020/2024 · 2026-06-24

Ashok S Kinagi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:32166 WP No. 36020 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI WRIT PETITION NO. 36020 OF 2024 (S-RES) BETWEEN: SRI. K. A. SRIDHARA S/O SRI. ANJANEYAPPA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.41, 1st MAIN ROAD, 1st CROSS, VINAYAKA NAGARA, MEDAHALLI, K R PURAM, BENGALURU …PETITIONER (BY SRI. K.V. SHIVA REDDY, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE ADMINISTRATOR KIDWAI MEMORIAL INSTITUTE OF ONCOLOGY, DR. M H MARIGOWDA ROAD, BENGALURU 560 029 2. THE DIRECTOR KIDWAI MEMORIAL INSTITUTE OF ONCOLOGY, DR. M H MARIGOWDA ROAD, BENGALURU 560029 Digitally signed by SHILPABAI S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:32166 WP No. 36020 of 2024 3. THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER KIDWAI MEMORIAL INSTITUTE OF ONCOLOGY, DR. M H MARIGOWDA ROAD, BENGALURU 560029 4. CHANDRAKANTH MEDICAL IMAGING TECHNOLOGIST KIDWAI MEMORIAL INSTITUTE OF ONCOLOGY, DR. M H MARIGOWDA ROAD, BENGALURU 560029 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MOHAN S., ADVOCATE FOR R4 R1, R2 & R3 ARE SERVED) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO A) ISSUE A WRIT IN THE CERTIORARI QUASHING THE ORDER OF SUSPENSION BEARING No.KMIO/Admn/Sibbandi 5B/13/2024, DTD 18.04.2024 ISSUED BY THE R-1 PRODUCED AT ANNX-A AS ARBITRARY AND ILLEGAL. B) ISSUE SUCH OTHER ORDERS OR DIRECTIONS AS THIS HON’BLE COURT MAY DEEM FIT UNDER THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:32166 WP No. 36020 of 2024 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner filed a memo stating that the petitioner challenged the order of suspension and has subsequently revoked the order of suspension vide order dated 08.05.2026. In view of the same, nothing survives for consideration in this writ petition and prays to dispose of the writ petition as having become infructuous. 2. The memo is placed on record. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of as having rendered infructuous. Sd/- (ASHOK S.KINAGI) JUDGE SSB