ABDUL RAOUF AND OTHERS v. UNION TERRITORY OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR TH INCHARGE SHO POLICE STATION POONCH AND ANOTHER
CRM(M)/688/2021 · 2026-08-14
Rajesh Sekhri
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2528 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2528 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
CrlM No. 102/2026 in CRM(M) No. 688/2021
Abdul Raouf and Ors.
….. Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s)
Through: Mr. Rohit Kotwal, Advocate q
vs
UT of J&K and Anr. .…. Respondent(s)
Through: Mr. Mazher Ali Khan, Advocate for R- 2
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SEKHRI, JUDGE
ORDER 14.08.2026
CrlM No. 102/2026
01. For the reasons stated in the application coupled with submissions made at Bar, same is allowed and CRM(M) No. 688/2021 is restored to its original number.
02. CrlM is disposed of. CrlM No. 2034/2023
01. For the reasons stated in the application coupled with submissions made at Bar, same is allowed and compromise deed annexed with application is taken is record.
02. CrlM is disposed of.
CRM(M) No. 688/2021
01. With the consensus of learned counsels for the parties, main petition is taken on board for consideration.
02. Learned counsel for the petitioner and respondent No.2- the complainant, at whose instance, impugned FIR came to be registered, have submitted that since parties have entered into amicable settlement Sr. No. 13
2
and petitioner No.1 and respondent No.2- the complainant have dissolved their marriage, continuation of proceedings in the impugned FIR shall be an exercise in futility. Respondent No.2, present in the Court has submitted that she has no objection to the quashment of the impugned FIR.
03. In view of the above, present petition is allowed and impugned FIR is quashed.
04. Disposed of along with connected application(s).
05. Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(Rajesh Sekhri)
Judge
Jammu 14.08.2026 Riya