Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 25279 (KAR)

SRI V D CHANDRU v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/45687/2019 · 2026-06-29

E S Indiresh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:32022 WP NO.45687 OF 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S. INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.45687 OF 2019 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. V.D. CHANDRU S/O SRI. K.C. DASHARATHA RAMAIAH SHETTY, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS. 2. SMT. V.C. LAKSHMI KALA W/O SRI. V.D. CHANDRA, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS. BOTH ARE RESIDING AT: NO.471/1, ANJANEYA TEMPLE STREET, KRISHNARAJAPURAM EXTENSION, BENGALURU - 560 036. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SARVAD KALMAT, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. K.M. SOMASHEKARA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU - 560 001. 2. THE TAHSILDAR KRISHNARAJAPURAM, BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT - 560 036. 3. THE PROJECT DIRECTOR AND DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA (MINISTRY OF ROAD TRANSPORT AND HIGHWAYS), Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:32022 WP NO.45687 OF 2019 SY.NO.13, 14TH KILOMETRE, BENGALURU-TUMKURU ROAD, NAGASANDRA VILLAGE, BENGALURU - 560 073. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. B.P. RADHA, AGA FOR R1 AND R2; SMT. SHILPA SHAH, ADVOCATE FOR R3) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE NOTICES DATED 21ST AUGUST, 2019 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDNET NO.2-TAHSILDAR VIDE ANNEXURES 'E', 'F', 'G' AND 'H'; AND ETC. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S. INDIRESH ORAL ORDER In this petition, petitioners are challenging the Notices dated 21st August, 2019 (Annexures 'E', 'F', 'G' and 'H') issued by the respondent No.2-Tahisildar 2. Heard Sri. Sarvad Kalmat, learned counsel on behalf of Sri. K.M. Somashekara, appearing for petitioners; Smt. B.P. Radha, learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for respondents 1 and 2; and Smt. Shilpa Shah, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.3. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:32022 WP NO.45687 OF 2019 3. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties and on perusal of the impugned notices, it is forthcoming that the respondent No.2-Tahsildar issued notices to the petitioners alleging the encroachment by the petitioners in National Highway-44 (Bengaluru-Kolar-Mulbagal). In that view of the matter, it is open for the respondents 2 and 3 to conduct survey in the presence of the petitioners and demarcate the land and thereby identify whether the land belonging to the Government has been encroached by the petitioners or not. Accordingly, respondents 2 and 3 are directed to conduct spot inspection and demarcate the land in the presence of the petitioners on or before 10th August, 2026. With this observation, writ petition stands disposed of. SD/- (E.S. INDIRESH) JUDGE ARK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 4