224 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-7266-2026 Date of Decision: 02.07.2026 SUKHWINDER AND ANOTHER ...Petitioners Vs. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ...Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Present: Mr. Nirmal Singh, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Tanuj Sharma, AAG, Haryana. VIRINDER AGGARWAL , J. (Oral) 1. The present Criminal Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking direction to respondent No. 2 and 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners, which is stated to be under imminent threat at the hands of the private respondents, including their relatives and others, and further seeking a direction restraining the private respondents from interfering in the petitioners’ personal life, peaceful living, and liberty. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners, on instructions, submits that at present there is no apprehension of any danger to the life and liberty of the petitioners from the private respondents, as alleged in the petition. 3. In view of the aforesaid statement made by learned counsel for the petitioners, nothing survives for adjudication in the present petition. 4. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. (VIRINDER AGGARWAL) JUDGE 02.07.2026 kv Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No KUMUD VERMA 2026.07.02 17:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh