Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 25263 (KAR)

SMT.MEENAKSHI ROY v. S N ASHWATHNARAYANA

MFA/8618/2019 · 2026-06-24

Pradeep Singh Yerur

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:31577 MFA No. 8618 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 8618 OF 2019 (CPC) BETWEEN: SMT.MEENAKSHI ROY, W/O. PRASHANT ROY, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, PROPRIETRIX OF M/S. RENAISSANCE, RESIDING AT NO.B-401, WHISPERING MEADOWS, DOLLARS COLONY, RMV II STAGE, BENGALURU - 560 094. …APPELLANT (BY MS.DRISYYA SHETTY, ADVOCATE FOR SRI.RAGHURAM CADAMBI, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI. S.N.ASHWATHNARAYANA, S/O. LATE S. N.KRISHNAMURTHY, AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.14, 'MANGALAGIRI', 3RD MAIN ROAD, POSTAL COLONY, SANJAYNAGAR, RMV EXTENSION, II STAGE, BENGALURU - 560 094. 2. M/S. KARNATAKA STATE FINANCIAL CORPORATION, Digitally signed by GAVRIBIDANUR SUBRAMANYA GUPTA SREENATH Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:31577 MFA No. 8618 of 2019 KSFC BHAVANA, NO.1/1, THIMMAIAH ROAD, NEAR CANTONMENT RAILWAY STATION, BENGALURU - 560 062. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.KANIKARAJ, ADVOCATE FOR R1; SRI.P.S.MALIPATIL, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS MFA IS FILED U/O 43 RULE 1(d) OF CPC AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 18.11.2019 PASSED IN MISC.PETITION NO.961/2019 ON THE FILE OF THE LII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL JUDGE, BENGALURU (CCH-53), DISMISSING THE PETITION FILED UNDER ORDER 9 RULE 13 OF CPC. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR ORAL JUDGMENT Smt.Drisyya Shetty, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant submits that in pursuance to filing of the suit for eviction by the plaintiff, respondent No.1 has vacated the suit schedule property as per the settlement recorded in RFA No.2321 of 2019. Therefore, the present appeal would not survive for consideration - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:31577 MFA No. 8618 of 2019 anymore and the same has been rendered infructuous. Respondent No.2 herein is only a formal party. Placing the said submission on record, the appeal is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (PRADEEP SINGH YERUR) JUDGE MKM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 26