IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 111 COCP-2896-2026 (O&M) Date of decision: 01.07.2026 Rajinder ...Petitioner Versus Roop Kumar Bansal and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS SURI Present: Mr. Shekhar Verma, Advocate and Mr. Rahul Chadha, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Gautam Kailey, DAG, Haryana. ***** VIKAS SURI, J. (Oral) 1. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that unfortunately, due to miscommunication between the petitioner and his earlier counsel, the factum of the petitioner having been dispossessed from the property in dispute, on 10.07.2025, could not be brought to the notice of the coordinate Bench, which disposed of the matter vide judgment dated 15.07.2025 while directing status quo to be maintained qua the possession of the said property. In view of the aforesaid, he seeks withdrawal of the present petition with liberty to make an appropriate application in CWP-19952-2019, which stands disposed of vide the aforesaid order. 2. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty aforesaid. (VIKAS SURI) July 01, 2026 JUDGE sumit.k Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether Reportable : Yes / No SUMIT KUMAR 2026.07.02 15:03 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment