Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 25261 (CHH)

SATISH KOSHLE v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/3477/2026 · 2026-07-06

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 CGHC010244372026 2026:CGHC:27898 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 3477 of 2026 1 - Satish Koshle S/o Late Mohan Koshle Aged About 27 Years R/o Village Sendh, Post Palod, Tahsil Mandir, Hasaud, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Revenue And Disaster Management, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District- Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - New Raipur Development Authority (N R D A), Through C.E.O. Address, Paryavas Bhawan, North Block- Sector- 19 Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Assistant Manager (Land) New Raipur Development Authority (N R D A), Address, Paryavas Bhawan, North Block- Sector- 19 Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 4 - General Manager (Rehabilitation Authority (N R D A), Address, Paryavas Bhawan, North Block- Sector- 19 Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 5 - Ayush Agrawal The M /s Barbrik Projects Ltd, In Consortium With P R A India Pvt Ltd, Address City Mall Vikash Pvt Ltd, Telibandha Raipur District- Raipur Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Shri Sanjeev Kumar Sahu, Advocate. For Respondent- NRDA : Shri Animesh Tiwari, Advocate. For State : Ms. Diksha Gouraha, Dy GA. SB: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 07/07/2026 1. By way of this Writ Petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs:- 10.1 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction to the respondent AVINASH SHARMA Digitally signed by AVINASH SHARMA Date: 2026.07.08 10:41:46 +0530 2 authorities to consider the claim of the petitioner in accordance to rehabilitation scheme and in accordance with law and provide them with 1200Sq.ft. of land at nominal rent of Rs. 1/years; 10.2 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondents authorities to grant compensation amount to the petitioner for the loss of suffered by him due to demolition of the petitioner house. accordance with law. 10.3 That, the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow present case and direct the inquiry any constitutional committee to submit fair report of the present case. 10.4 Any other relief which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper may also be passed in favor of the petitioner together with cost of the petition. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing for some time seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty file appropriate application for his rehabilitation before the competent authority as the petitioner has sold the subject land to NRDA-respondent and the NRDA is required to rehabilitate the petitioner. 3. In view of the submission made by the petitioner, this Writ Petition is disposed of as withdrawn reserving liberty in favour of the petitioner that if he moves an appropriate application for his rehabilitation before the concerned authority within a period of 10 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order, the said application shall be decided by authority concerned by passing appropriate order, in accordance with law, within a period of 90 days from the date of receipt of such application. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Avinash