Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 25259 (CHH)

VIKASH NAYAK v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

CRA/1194/2026 · 2026-07-07

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 CGHC010153292026 2026:CGHC:28142-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRA No. 1194 of 2026 Vikash Nayak S/o Jagdish Prasad Nayak Aged About 40 Years R/o Village Near Babkheda School Police Station Baldevgarh, District Tikamgarh, (M.P.) ... Appellant(s) versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through - The Station House Officer, Police Station G.R.P. District Bilaspur C.G. 2. National Investigatint Agency Through - Superintendent Of Police NIA, Raipur Branch Atal Nagar Nawa Raipur District Raipur C.G. ...Respondent(s) (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Appellant : Mr. Sunil Verma, Advocate. For Respondent/State : Mr. Sumit Singh, Deputy Advocate General. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal , Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice 08.07.2026 1. Heard Mr. Sunil Verma, learned counsel for the appellant. Also heard Mr. Sumit Singh, learned Deputy Advocate General, appearing for the State. BRIJMOHAN MORLE Digitally signed by BRIJMOHAN MORLE Date: 2026.07.08 17:39:07 +0530 2 2. The present appeal has been filed by the appellant with the following prayer: “It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow the appeal and also be pleased to grant bail to the appellant in the ends of justice.” 3. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that, since the appellant has already been acquitted by the learned Trial Court vide judgment dated 12.06.2026, the present appeal has become infructuous. 4. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the appellant, the present appeal stands dismissed as infructuous. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Brijmohan