1 CGHC010277752023 2026:CGHC:28015 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 6307 of 2023 1 - Vinod Kumar Rathore S/o Shri Ram Krishna Rathore Aged About 40 Years R/o Gevra Basti, Kusmunda Korba, District : Korba, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Throug The Secretary, Department Of Revenue, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Collector Collectorate, Korba, District : Korba, Chhattisgarh 3 - Sub - Divisional Officer (Re) Katghora, Korba, District : Korba, Chhattisgarh 4 - Tahsildar, Dipka Tahsil Katghora, Korba, District : Korba, Chhattisgarh 5 - South Eastern Coalfields Limited (S.E.C.L.) Through Its Chairman Cum Managing Director, Head Officer - Seepat Road, Bilaspur, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 6 - Chief General Manager, S.E.C.L Kusmunda Region, Kusmunda, Korba, District : Korba, Chhattisgarh 7 - General Manager (Operations) S.E.C.L. Kusmunda Region, Kusmunda, Korba, District : Korba, Chhattisgarh 8 - Deputy General Manager (Personnel), S.E.C.L. Kusmunda Region, Kusmunda, Korba, District : Korba, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents RUKHSAR BANO Digitally signed by RUKHSAR BANO Date: 2026.07.08 10:40:01 +0530 2 (Cause title, as taken from CIS) For Petitioner For State/Resp. No.1 to 4 For Respondent Nos.5 to 8 : : : Mrs. Nandini Dwivedi, Advocate appears on behalf of Mr. Dhiraj K. Wankhede, Advocate Ms. Vartika Shrivastava, Panel Lawyer Mr. Satish Gupta, Advocate. (Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Order on Board 07/07/2026 1. Heard on I.A. No.02/2026, an application for seeking withdrawal of captioned writ petition (service). 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner does not wish to prosecute the present writ petition. Hence, she prays that the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the instant writ petition. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents have no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner. 4. Upon due consideration and for the reasons mentioned in the application, which is well supported by an affidavit, the said application is allowed. The petitioner is permitted to withdraw the present writ petition. 5. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn. 6. Pending interlocutory application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. No order as to cost(s). Sd/- (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) JUDGE Rukhsar