T. Pradyumna Kumar Reddy v. State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary
WP/25913/2018 · 2026-02-25
Sumathi Jagadam
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 25254 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 25254 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010548562018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] THURSDAY,THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 25913/2018 Between:
1. T. PRADYUMNA KUMAR REDDY, S/O. LATE T. CHANDRA SEKHAR REDDY AGE 62 YEARS, OCC. PRACTICING ADVOCATE AT HIGH COURT AT HYDERABAD, R/O. PLOT NO. 373-A, ROAD NO. 22, JUBILEE HILLS, HYDERABAD -33. 2. E.V.SHYAM SUNDAR REDDY, S/O. E. VARADA REDDY, AGE 70 YEARS, LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE OF E. VIJAYA LAKSHMI, R/O.
203, PALM SPRINGS, SHANTINAGAR, HYDERABAD. ...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. 2. CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF LAND ADMINISTRATION, ANDHRA PRADESH, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ANANTAPUR, ANDHRA PRADESH,
4. REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, ANANTHAPURAMU, ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH,
5. TAHSILDAR, ANANTHAPURAMU, ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT,
6. THE SUB REGISTRAR, ANANTHAPURAMU RURAL, ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT
2 JS, J W.P.No.25913/2018
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toissue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Certiorari to call for records and quash the award of the 4th respondent vide Award No. Rc. No. D1-LA/4519/2012, dated 26.12.2017 and direct the 4th respondent to pass a fresh award to strict conformity with section 26 of The Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 by taking into consideration the basic value register price of the subject land and also 100 percent solatium as per Sec. 30 (1) Act, 12 percent Additional Market Value as per Sec. 30(3) of the Act and all other statutory benefits including rent and damages/interest from the date of taking possession till the date of notification and grant IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the 4th respondent to pass afresh award in respect of determination of compensation amount for the acquired land (admeasuring Ac.
4.72 in Sy No. 33/9 and 33/11 of Kakkalapalli Ville and mandal, Anatapur District) in strict conformity with Section 26 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 and make payment of the same pending disposal of the writ petition, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. PASHAM MOHITH Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR LAND ACQUISITION (AP)
3 JS, J W.P.No.25913/2018
The Court made the following ORDER:
Sri.Sreedhar Dasari, learned counsel appearing through online for the petitioners submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication. Since the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date: 26.02.2026 rsd
4 JS, J W.P.No.25913/2018
10 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 25913/2018
Date: 26.02.2026 rsd