Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2525 (PNJ)

ANIL KUMAR v. UT OF CHANDIGARH

CRM-M/22573/2026 · 2026-04-29

Aman Chaudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 104 CRM-M-22573-2026 (O&M) Date of decision: 29.04.2026 ANIL KUMAR ... Petitioner Versus UT OF CHANDIGARH ... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Present : Mr. Deepak Jaglan, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Manish Bansal, PP, UT Chandigarh and Ms. Sarasmi Budhiraja, Advocate for UT Chandigarh. **** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (Oral). 1. Learned counsel for the UT Chandigarh has filed status report, which is taken on record and refers to para 5 thereof to state that the petitioner stands arrested in another matter and taken on production warrant in the present case, in view of which, the present petition has been rendered infructuous, a fact his learned counsel is unable to controvert. 2. Disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. (AMAN CHAUDHARY) 29.04.2026 JUDGE ashok Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No ASHOK KUMAR 2026.04.29 16:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document