Marriboina Siva Shanker v. The Project Director, District Water Management Agency
WP/39883/2012 · 2026-03-10
Harinath N
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 25249 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 25249 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010553282012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] WEDNESDAY,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION No.39883/2012 Between:
1.MARRIBOINA SIVA SHANKER, S/O SRI.SAMBAIAH, A/A 26 YRS, OCC:
FORMER FILED ASSISTANT, MAHATMA GANDHI NATIONAL RURAL EMPLOYMENT GURANTEE SCHEME, R/O PAMIDIPADU VILLAGE, KORISAPADU MANDAL PRAKASHAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1.THE PROJECT DIRECTOR DISTRICT WATER MANAGEMENT AGENCY, PRAKASHAM DISTRICT, ONGOLE. 2.THE MANDAL PARISHAD DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, KORISAPADU MANDAL, PRAKASHAM DISTRICT.
3.THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, PRAKASHAM DISTRICT, ONGOLE. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toIssue a writ, order or direction more particularly in the nature of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ declaring (i) the impugned order in R.C.No.D4/626/2010 dt.01.09.2012 passed by the 3rd respondent rejecting the appeal of the petitioner as illegal, arbitrary and violative of principles of Natural Justice and set aside the same (ii) call for the records from the respondents herein by issuing an appropriate writ
order or direction especially one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus by declaring the proceedings of 3rd respondent dt.01.09.2012 is nothing but reiteration of the earlier
order passed by the same authority (iii) direct the respondents to continue the petitioner in his respective Panchyath as Filed Assistant and pay salaries (iv) and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2012(WPMP 50645 OF 2012 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased suspend the operation of the impugned proceedings in R.C.No.D4/626/2010 dt.01.09.2012 passed by the Respondent no.3 confirming the orders of respondent no.1 in removing the petitioner from the post of Field Assistants of Pamidipadu Gram Panchyath and to direct the respondents to continue as Field Assistant of Pamidipadu Gram Panchyath pending disposal of the present writ and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP 175391 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.C N MOORTY Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.SPL C FOR NREGS(M S R CHANDRA MURTHY) 2.GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEV The Court made the following:
2 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION No.39883 OF 2012
ORDER :
1. The petitioner is challenging the order passed by the 3rd respondent, rejecting the appeal preferred against the order of termination passed by the 2nd respondent. The petitioner is also seeking a direction to appoint him as Field Assistant and to pay all salaries.
2. The learned Standing Counsel for the respondent No.1 submits that the petitioner was engaged on a contract basis for a specified period, and that the contract period expired in the year 2011. Thereafter, the petitioner was not in service of the respondent. It is also submitted that the respondents have engaged the services of another contractor, and as such, nothing further survives to be adjudicated on merits.
3. Recording the same, the writ petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Dated 11.03.2026 KGM
3 146 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION No.39883 OF 2012 Dated 11.03.2026 KGM