Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 25243 (AP)

POTLURI BAHSKAR MURTHY v. VEMURI VIJAYA LAKSHMI

CRP/2992/2024 · 2026-03-17

Ravi Cheemalapati

Original Suitbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010543532024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH WEDNESDAY,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CIVIL REVISION PETITION Between: 1. POTLURI BAHSKAR MURTHY, S/O. JANARDHANA MURTHY, AGED 58 YEARS, R/O. D.NO. 29 SURYARAOPETA, VIJAYAWADA. 1. VEMURI VIJAYA LAKSHMI, W/O. VEMURIKOTESWARA RAO, S/O. VENKATA RAMAIAH, AGED 71 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.29 DR.VISHNUVARDHAN RAO STREET, SURYARAOPETA, VIJAYAWADA. 2. VEMURI KOTESWARA RAO, S/O. VENKATA RAMAIAH, AGED 79 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.29 SURYARAOPETA, VIJAYAWADA. Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased topleased to set I.A.No.254/2024 in O.S.No.87/2 andSession Judge, Vijayawada a consequentially appoint advocate commissioner to measure the suit schedule property with the help of Mandal Surveyor and to fix the boundary stones to the suit the schedule basing on the Title Deed of the defendants with correct survey number, by leaving State Highway (Vijayawada 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2992/2024 POTLURI BAHSKAR MURTHY, S/O. JANARDHANA MURTHY, AGED 58 YEARS, R/O. D.NO. 29-7-49, VISHNUVARDHAN RAO STREET, SURYARAOPETA, VIJAYAWADA. ...PETITIONER AND VEMURI VIJAYA LAKSHMI, W/O. VEMURIKOTESWARA RAO, S/O. RAMAIAH, AGED 71 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.29 DR.VISHNUVARDHAN RAO STREET, SURYARAOPETA, VEMURI KOTESWARA RAO, S/O. VENKATA RAMAIAH, AGED 79 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.29-7-35/1, DR.VISHNUVARDHAN RAO STREET, SURYARAOPETA, VIJAYAWADA. ...RESPOND Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased topleased to set-aside the orders dated 28/08/2024 passed in I.A.No.254/2024 in O.S.No.87/2022 on the file of the XIII Additional District andSession Judge, Vijayawada a consequentially appoint advocate commissioner to measure the suit schedule property with the help of Mandal Surveyor and to fix the boundary stones to the suit the schedule basing on the Title Deed of the defendants with correct survey number, by leaving State Highway (Vijayawada-Nuziveedu) on the northern side and RC,J CRP No.2992 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3332] WEDNESDAY,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF MARCH THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI POTLURI BAHSKAR MURTHY, S/O. JANARDHANA MURTHY, AGED 49, VISHNUVARDHAN RAO STREET, ...PETITIONER VEMURI VIJAYA LAKSHMI, W/O. VEMURIKOTESWARA RAO, S/O. RAMAIAH, AGED 71 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.29-7-35/1, DR.VISHNUVARDHAN RAO STREET, SURYARAOPETA, VEMURI KOTESWARA RAO, S/O. VENKATA RAMAIAH, AGED 79 35/1, DR.VISHNUVARDHAN RAO STREET, ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be aside the orders dated 28/08/2024 passed in 022 on the file of the XIII Additional District andSession Judge, Vijayawada a consequentially appoint advocate commissioner to measure the suit schedule property with the help of Mandal Surveyor and to fix the boundary stones to the suit the schedule property basing on the Title Deed of the defendants with correct survey number, by Nuziveedu) on the northern side and RC,J CRP No.2992 of 2024 2 private road on the southern side, if it exists and grant such other relief or reliefs Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. KILARU NITHIN KRISHNA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. PILLIX LAW FIRM The Court made the following: ORDER Sri K.S.Murthy, learned senior counsel, sought permission of this Court to withdraw this Civil Revision Petition to move appropriate application before the trial Court for reentrustment of warrant seeking clarification. 2. Permission accorded. 3. In view of the above, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as withdrawn granting liberty to the petitioner to move appropriate application before the trial Court. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI 18TH March, 2026. RR