Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 25239 (AP)

AVULA SUBBARAMAIAH v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/29273/2025 · 2026-01-07

D Ramesh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010549832025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] THURSDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 29273 Of 2025 Between: 1. AVULA SUBBARAMAIAH, S/O BAKKAIAH, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS 2. GUNDAVOLU RAMAIAH, S/O CHINNA MALLAIAH, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS 3. GUNDAVOLU CHINNA MALLAIAH, S/O VEERAIAH, AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS 4. DASARI PULLAIAH, S/O PENCHALAIAH, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS 5. BONIGALA PULLAIAH, S/O PENCHALAIAH, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS 6. BOWGALA KANTHAMMA, W/O LATE PEODETOFATO, AGED ABORT 70 YEARS. 7. CHALLA PEDA VENKATAIAH, STO VADALAIH, AGAS ABOTJRT 75YEARS. 8. MALLI PEDDA ANITHA, W/O MASTENAIAH, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS. 9. JADAPALLI MEERAIAH, S/O MASTANAIAH, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS 10. PARUCHURU JANARDHAN, 10. S/O LAKSHMI NARASIAH, AGED ABOUT 60 YEA 11. JOREPALLI VENKATA LAKSHMAMMA, W/O CHENCHURAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, 12. 12. ALAKUNTA SEENAIAH, S/O PENCHALAIAH, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, S/O RAGAIAH, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, 13. MADDE PENCHALA RAMAIAH, AGEDV OUT70 YEARS. 14. AMBATI SAMBEIAH, S O VENKAIAH, AGED ABOUT 55YEARS 15. DASARI RAMANAIAH, S/O BANGARAIAH, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, 16. RACHAKONDA PENCHALASWAMY, S/O NARASAIAH, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, 2 17. RACHAKONDA PENCHALAIAH, S/O NARASAIAH, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, 18. MADDE RAJESWARAMMA, W/O CHANDRAIAH, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, 19. MADDE RAMADEVI, W/O CHANDRAIAH, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS 20. MADDE GANGADHAR, S/O CHANDRAIAH. AGE ABOUT 45 YEARS. 21. MADDE ESWARIAH, AGED ABOUT 50 22. RACTEKONDA SIVAAH, S/O KRISHNAIAH, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS . 23. ADHWANAPU SAMTELAH, S/O PEROTELA RAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS . 24. ALAKUNTA VENKATESHWARLU, S/O PENCHALAIAH, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS. 25. ALAKUNTA ANKAIAH, S/O. PENCHALIAH, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, 26. RACHAKONDA NAIASIMHULU, S/O NARASIAH, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, 27. KUNCTEM HARAIAH, S/O VENKATASWAMY AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS 28. MACCHA SRINIVASULU, S/O VENKATASWAMY, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS. 29. MACCHA NARAYANA, S/O PENCHALAIAH, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS. 30. TAIDUPATI RATNAMMA, W/O LATE VENKATAIAH LR W/O TAIDUPATI RATNAMMA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS 31. KARIPAM VENKATARAMAIAH, S/O PENCHALAIAH AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS 32. CHALLA RAMESH, S/O PENCHALAIAH AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS 33. CHALLA PENCHALAIAH, S/O PEDA VENKATA RAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS ALL THE PETITIONERS ARE RESIDENTS OF GUNDAVOLU VILLAGE,RAPUR MANDAL SPSR NELLORE DIST ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, , REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, IRRIGATION AND COMMAND AREA DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, 2. THE COMMISSIONER R AND R, GOLLAPUDI, 3 VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT. 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 4. THE SPECIAL COLLECTORLA, TELUGU GANGA PROJECT, NEELAGIRI SANGAM, NELLORE TOWN, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 5. THE SPECIAL DEPUTY COLLECTOR LA TELUGU GANGA PROJECT, RAPUR AT NELLORE (UNIT) NEELAGIRI SANGAM NELLORE TOWN SPSR NELLORE DIST ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ or direction declaring the action of the respondents in not providing the benefits to the petitioners under Rehabilitation and Resettlement Scheme and as provided by the Government Under different orders issued from time to time as illegal and arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents to extent the benefits under Rehabilitation and Resettlement scheme to the petitioners including cost of construction of houses as per the orders issued under GO Rt.No.641 Water Resources (R AND R-A2) Department dated 14- 09-2016. Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. VENKATA RAMANA RAO BATCHU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR LAND ACQUISITION 2. GP FOR IRRI AND CAD 4 Order: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following prayer; “….to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ or direction declaring the action of the respondents in not providing the benefits to the petitioners under Rehabilitation and Resettlement Scheme and as provided by the Government Under different orders issued from time to time as illegal and arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents to extent the benefits under Rehabilitation and Resettlement scheme to the petitioners including cost of construction of houses as per the orders issued under G.O.Rt.No.641 Water Resources (R & R-A2) Department dated 14-09-2016.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners Mr. V.Jagadeesh seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition. 3. Permission is accorded. 4. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. 5. As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. __________________ D. RAMESH, J Date:08.01.2026 RMD/JAK 5 165 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 29273 of 2025 Date:08.01.2026 RMD/JAK