Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 25235 (CHH)

RAJENDRA PRASAD PANDEY v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/8002/2019 · 2026-07-07

Shri Narendra Kumar Vyas

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 CGHC010313632019 2026:CGHC:28321 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 8002 of 2019 Rajendra Prasad Pandey S/o Shri Kuleshwar Prasad Pandey Aged About 60 Years Presently Posted And Working As Assistant Revenue Inspector, Municipal Corporation, Dhamtari Police Station And District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh., District : Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Urban Administration And Dev. Department, Mahanadi Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, Post Office And Police Station Rakhi, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2. Managing Director Chhattisgarh Infrastructure Development Department, (Parivahan Prabhag), Old Police Headquarter, Phq Bhawan, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3. Municipal Corporation Dhamtari Through Commissioner, Dhamtari, District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh., District : Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh 4. Nagar Panchayat, Bodla Through C.M.O. Nagar Panchayat Bodla, District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh., District : Kawardha (Kabirdham), Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Bharti Khunte, Advocate appears on behalf of Mr. Vivek Kumar Agrawal, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Kalpesh Ruparel, Panel Lawyer For Respondent No.2 : Mr. Harsh Tripathi, Advocate SANTOSH KUMAR SHARMA Digitally signed by SANTOSH KUMAR SHARMA Date: 2026.07.08 16:55:17 +0530 2 Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas Order on Board 08.07.2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the grievance of the petitioner has already been resolved. 2. Considering the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the grievance raised by the petitioner has already been resolved. Therefore, nothing is required to be adjudicated in this case. 3. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is dismissed as having infractuous Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge santosh