1 CGHC010184762026 2026:CGHC:27820-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR REVP No. 181 of 2026 The Income Tax Officer-2, District Raigarh, C.G. (Appellant in Tax Appeal) ... Petitioner versus Bishambhar Dayal Agrawal, Contractor, Ludeg, Pathalgaon, District Jashpur (C.G.) (Respondent in Tax Appeal) ... Respondent Division Bench: - Hon'ble Shri Sanjay K. Agrawal and Hon’ble Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad, JJ. Order (In Chamber) (06/07/2026) Sanjay K. Agrawal , J. 1. This review petition is filed for review/recall of judgment dated 15-10-2024 passed by this Court in TAXC No.111/2024 and it has been taken-up for consideration in Chamber in view of Rule 90(2) of the High Court of Chhattisgarh Rules, 2007. 2. We have gone through the review petition and the annexed documents. 3. The tax case has been allowed to be withdrawn to the Revenue on the basis of the statement made on their behalf and particularly, relying upon the circular dated 17-9-2024 in which monetary SISTA SOMAYAJULU Digitally signed by SISTA SOMAYAJULU Date: 2026.07.08 12:10:46 +0530 2 limits for filing of appeals in income-tax cases is assessed to be ₹ 2 crores and in the present case, liability has been assessed to be less than ₹ 2 crores. 4. In that view of the matter, after going through the record of the review petition and the documents annexed therewith and also the judgment under review, I do not find any error apparent on the face of record warranting review of the judgment dated 15-10- 2024 passed by this Court in TAXC No.111/2024. Accordingly, the review petition is dismissed in limine in terms of Rule 90(2) of the Rules of 2007 finding no sufficient cause for review of the judgment under review. No order as to cost(s). Sd/- Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Judge Soma