UCN CONSTRUCTION CO. PVT. LTD. v. UNION OF INDIA AND 6 ORS
WP(C)/1547/2026 · 2026-03-15
Manish Choudhury
Writ Petition (Civil)body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2523 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2523 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010052642026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/1547/2026 UCN CONSTRUCTION CO. PVT. LTD.
A PRIVATE LIMITED COMPANY REGISTERED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT HAVING ITS HEAD OFFICE AT R.K. PATH, ITACHALI, NAGAON- 782003, DISTRICT- NAGAON, ASSAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR, SRI PIYUSH KUMAR NAHATA, 43 YEARS VERSUS UNION OF INDIA AND 6 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA,, MINISTRY OF ROAD TRANSPORT AND HIGHWAYS, TRANSPORT BHAWAN, PARLIAMENT STREET, NEW DELHI- 110001 2:THE DIRECTOR GENERAL (ROAD DEVELOPMENT) AND SPECIAL SECRETARY MINISTRY OF ROAD TRANSPORT AND HIGHWAYS TRANSPORT BHAWAN PARLIAMENT STREET NEW DLEHI- 110001 3:THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR GENERAL (ROAD DEVELOPMENT) AND SPECIAL SECRETARY MINISTRY OF ROAD TRANSPORT AND HIGHWAYS TRANSPORT BHAWAN PARLIAMENT STREET NEW DELHI- 110001 4:THE REGIONAL OFFICER MORTH RAJGARH ROAD
Page No.# 2/3 CHANDMARI GUWAHATI- 781003 5:THE SPECIAL COMMISSIONER AND SPECIAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM P.W. (BUILDING AND NH) DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI- 781006 6:THE CHIEF ENGINEER PWD (NH WORKS) ASSAM CHANDMARI GUWAHATI-3 7:RANA CONSTRUCTION AND ENGINEERS PVT. LTD.
HAVING ITS OFFICE AT SURAJ COMPLEX ULUBARI CHARIALI GUWAHATI- 781007 DISTRICT- KAMRUP (METRO) EMAIL- RANACONSTRUCTIONPVTLTD@GMAIL.COM PHONE NO.- 0361355039 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. D DAS SR. ADV, MR U GHOSH,MR. D P BORAH Advocate for the Respondent : DY.S.G.I., FOR CAVEATOR,MRS R DEKA,SC, PWD
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY ORDER Date : 16-03-2026 Mr. D. Das, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. D.P. Borah, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that in view of a new cause of action, the petitioner wants to withdraw the writ petition, with the liberty, to file afresh. In view of the above submission made by Mr. Das, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed on withdrawal, with the liberty,
Page No.# 3/3 as prayed for.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant